Literature DB >> 30626638

Selective Sweeps.

Wolfgang Stephan1.   

Abstract

For almost 20 years, many inference methods have been developed to detect selective sweeps and localize the targets of directional selection in the genome. These methods are based on population genetic models that describe the effect of a beneficial allele (e.g., a new mutation) on linked neutral variation (driven by directional selection from a single copy to fixation). Here, I discuss these models, ranging from selective sweeps in a panmictic population of constant size to evolutionary traffic when simultaneous sweeps at multiple loci interfere, and emphasize the important role of demography and population structure in data analysis. In the past 10 years, soft sweeps that may arise after an environmental change from directional selection on standing variation have become a focus of population genetic research. In contrast to selective sweeps, they are caused by beneficial alleles that were neutrally segregating in a population before the environmental change or were present at a mutation-selection balance in appreciable frequency.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  background selection; demography; genetic hitchhiking; selective sweeps

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30626638      PMCID: PMC6325696          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  80 in total

1.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection.

Authors:  Joshua M Akey; Ge Zhang; Kun Zhang; Li Jin; Mark D Shriver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.

Authors:  Ines Hellmann; Ingo Ebersberger; Susan E Ptak; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The effect of selected linked locus on heterozygosity of neutral alleles (the hitch-hiking effect).

Authors:  T Ohta; M Kimura
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The hitchhiking effect on linkage disequilibrium between linked neutral loci.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan; Yun S Song; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Molly Przeworski; Graham Coop; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  An improved method for estimating the rate of fixation of favorable mutations based on DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  W Stephan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites.

Authors:  Talia Karasov; Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  32 in total

1.  How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic Signatures of Evolutionary Rescue by a Selective Sweep.

Authors:  Matthew M Osmond; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Recommendations for improving statistical inference in population genomics.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Charles F Aquadro; Mark Beaumont; Brian Charlesworth; Laurent Excoffier; Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley; Michael Lynch; Gil McVean; Bret A Payseur; Susanne P Pfeifer; Wolfgang Stephan; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 4.  Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Genetic architecture and adaptation of flowering time among environments.

Authors:  Wenjie Yan; Baosheng Wang; Emily Chan; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Revisiting the notion of deleterious sweeps.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Emma K Howell; Michael Lynch; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Population-specific, recent positive selection signatures in cultivated Cucumis sativus L. (cucumber).

Authors:  Xinrui Lin; Ning Zhang; Hongtao Song; Kui Lin; Erli Pang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

8.  Ancient Hybridization and Adaptive Introgression of an Invadolysin Gene in Schistosome Parasites.

Authors:  Roy N Platt; Marina McDew-White; Winka Le Clec'h; Frédéric D Chevalier; Fiona Allan; Aidan M Emery; Amadou Garba; Amina A Hamidou; Shaali M Ame; Joanne P Webster; David Rollinson; Bonnie L Webster; Timothy J C Anderson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Evolution, heterogeneity and global dispersal of cosmopolitan genotype of Dengue virus type 2.

Authors:  Surya Pavan Yenamandra; Carmen Koo; Suzanna Chiang; Han Shi Jeri Lim; Zhen Yuan Yeo; Lee Ching Ng; Hapuarachchige Chanditha Hapuarachchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Considering Genomic Scans for Selection as Coalescent Model Choice.

Authors:  Rebecca B Harris; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.