Literature DB >> 20229893

Organ doses to adult patients for chest CT.

Walter Huda1, Alexander Sterzik, Sameer Tipnis, U Joseph Schoepf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to estimate organ doses for chest CT examinations using volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) data as well as accounting for patient weight.
METHODS: A CT dosimetry spreadsheet (ImPACT CT patient dosimetry calculator) was used to compute organ doses for a 70 kg patient undergoing chest CT examinations, as well as volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) in a body CT dosimetry phantom at the same CT technique factors. Ratios of organ dose to CTDIvoI (f(organ)) were generated as a function of anatomical location in the chest for the breasts, lungs, stomach, red bone marrow, liver, thyroid, liver, and thymus. Values of f(organ) were obtained for x-ray tube voltages ranging from 80 to 140 kV for 1, 4, 16, and 64 slice CT scanners from two vendors. For constant CT techniques, we computed ratios of dose in water phantoms of differing diameter. By modeling patients of different weights as equivalent water cylinders of different diameters, we generated factors that permit the estimation of the organ doses in patients weighing between 50 and 100 kg who undergo chest CT examinations relative to the corresponding organ doses received by a 70 kg adult.
RESULTS: For a 32 cm long CT scan encompassing the complete lungs, values of f(organ) ranged from 1.7 (thymus) to 0.3 (stomach). Organs that are directly in the x-ray beam, and are completely irradiated, generally had f(organ), values well above 1 (i.e., breast, lung, heart, and thymus). Organs that are not completely irradiated in a total chest CT scan generally had f(organ) values that are less than 1 (e.g., red bone marrow, liver, and stomach). Increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV resulted in modest increases in f(organ) for the heart (9%) and thymus (8%), but resulted in larger increases for the breast (19%) and red bone marrow (21%). Adult patient chests have been modeled by water cylinders with diameters between approximately 20 cm for a 50 kg patient and approximately 28 cm for a 100 kg patient. At constant x-ray techniques, a 50 kg patient is expected to have doses that are approximately 18% higher than those in a 70 kg adult, whereas a 100 kg patient will have doses that are apparoximately 18% lower.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe a practical method to use CTDI data provided by commercial CT scanners to obtain patient and examination specific estimates of organ dose for chest CT examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229893      PMCID: PMC2826387          DOI: 10.1118/1.3298015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

1.  Managing patient dose in computed tomography. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2000

2.  Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions.

Authors:  Jonas Nilsson Althén
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  M Wintermark; P Maeder; F R Verdun; J P Thiran; J F Valley; P Schnyder; R Meuli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; M Roskopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients.

Authors:  W Huda; J V Atherton; D E Ware; W A Cumming
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kristin A Lieberman; Jack Chang; Marsha L Roskopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT.

Authors:  Kent Ogden; Walter Huda; Ernest M Scalzetti; Marsha L Roskopf
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J Demarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Andrew N Primak; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of adaptive iterative dose reduction on image quality in 320-detector row CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  F Tatsugami; M Matsuki; G Nakai; Y Inada; S Kanazawa; Y Takeda; H Morita; H Takada; S Yoshikawa; K Fukumura; Y Narumi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Characterisation of non-calcified coronary plaque by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography: comparison with histopathological specimens obtained by directional coronary atherectomy.

Authors:  Shigeki Kimura; Taishi Yonetsu; Keiko Suzuki; Mitsuaki Isobe; Yoshito Iesaka; Tsunekazu Kakuta
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.

Authors:  Maryam Khatonabadi; Di Zhang; Kelsey Mathieu; Hyun J Kim; Peiyun Lu; Dianna Cody; John J Demarco; Chris H Cagnon; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Accuracy of patient-specific organ dose estimates obtained using an automated image segmentation algorithm.

Authors:  Taly Gilat Schmidt; Adam S Wang; Thomas Coradi; Benjamin Haas; Josh Star-Lack
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-29

6.  Imaging Radiation Doses and Associated Risks and Benefits in Subjects Participating in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fresco; Gonzalo Spera; Carlos Meyer; Pablo Cabral; John R Mackey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Breast dose reduction for chest CT by modifying the scanning parameters based on the pre-scan size-specific dose estimate (SSDE).

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Tomohiro Namimoto; Daisuke Sakabe; Masahiro Hatemura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; Cameron H Williams; W Paul Segars; Daniel J Tward; Michael I Miller; J Tilak Ratnanather; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Considerations on the practical application of the size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) method of AAPM Report 204.

Authors:  Linhsia Noferini; Christian Fulcheri; Adriana Taddeucci; Marco Bartolini; Cesare Gori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Validity of the size-specific dose estimate in adults undergoing coronary CT angiography: comparison with the volume CT dose index.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Takeshi Nakaura; Noriyuki Kai; Takeshi Nozaki; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.