Literature DB >> 15057061

Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT.

Kent Ogden1, Walter Huda, Ernest M Scalzetti, Marsha L Roskopf.   

Abstract

Physical characteristics were obtained for 196 patients undergoing chest and abdomen computed tomography (CT) examinations. Computed tomography sections for these patients having no evident pathology were analyzed to determine patient dimensions (AP and lateral), together with the average attenuation coefficient. Patient weights ranged from approximately 3 kg to about 120 kg. For chest CT, the mean Hounsfield unit (HU) fell from about -120 HU for newborns to about -300 HU for adults. For abdominal CT, the mean HU for children and normal-sized adults was about 20 HU, but decreased to below -50 HU for adults weighing more than 100 kg. The effective photon energy and percent energy fluence transmitted through a given patient size and composition was calculated for representative x-ray spectra at 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV tube potentials. A 70-kg adult scanned at 120 kVp transmits 2.6% of the energy fluence for chest and 0.7% for abdomen CT examinations. Reducing the patient size to 10 kg increases transmission by an order of magnitude. For 70 kg patients, effective energies in body CT range from approximately 50 keV at 80 kVp to approximately 67 keV at 140 kVp; increasing patient size from 10 to 120 kg resulted in an increase in effective photon energy of approximately 4 keV. The x-ray transmission data and effective photon energy data can be used to determine CT image noise and image contrast, respectively, and information on patient size and composition can be used to determine patient doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057061     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200404000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  Extending the concept of weighted CT dose index to elliptical phantoms of various aspect ratios.

Authors:  Andrey Markovich; Ashraf G Morgan; Frank F Dong; Andrew N Primak; Xiang Li
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-05

2.  Organ doses to adult patients for chest CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Alexander Sterzik; Sameer Tipnis; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Extension of RPI-adult male and female computational phantoms to obese patients and a Monte Carlo study of the effect on CT imaging dose.

Authors:  Aiping Ding; Matthew M Mille; Tianyu Liu; Peter F Caracappa; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Internal calibration for opportunistic computed tomography muscle density analysis.

Authors:  Ainsley C J Smith; Justin J Tse; Tadiwa H Waungana; Kirsten N Bott; Michael T Kuczynski; Andrew S Michalski; Steven K Boyd; Sarah L Manske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Graham I Warden; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani; Aaron Sodickson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of Rhenium and Iodine as Contrast Agents in X-Ray Imaging.

Authors:  José Carlos De La Vega; Pedro Luis Esquinas; Jovan Kaur Gill; Selin Jessa; Bradford Gill; Yogesh Thakur; Katayoun Saatchi; Urs O Häfeli
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.161

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.