Literature DB >> 15933127

Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions.

Jonas Nilsson Althén1.   

Abstract

In this study, tube-current modulation systems on two different CT equipments have been evaluated: Care Dose from Siemens and Auto mA from GE Medical Systems. Care Dose modulates the tube current in the xy-plane during rotation whereas Auto mA modulates the tube current in the z-direction. xy-Plane modulation was investigated by using an elliptic Polymethylmethacrylate phantom and a CTDI-ion chamber. To investigate modulation in the z-direction, an anthropomorphic dosimetry phantom (Atom) was used. Tests performed with and without tube-current modulation were compared with respect to absorbed dose and image quality. In the anthropomorphic phantom measurements, the dose savings were 15% using Care Dose and the photon starvation artefacts were negligible. Using Auto mA the absorbed dose depends on the chosen noise level. Image noise becomes more constant throughout the patient but photon starvation artefacts remain. We conclude that the two tube-current modulation techniques show different dose advantages and image quality artefacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933127     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of the radiation exposure of a chest pain protocol with ECG-gating in dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Dominik Ketelsen; Marie H Luetkhoff; Christoph Thomas; Matthias Werner; Markus Buchgeister; Ilias Tsiflikas; Anja Reimann; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patric Kröpil; Roland Fenk; Lars B Fritz; Dirk Blondin; Guido Kobbe; Ulrich Mödder; Mathias Cohnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Construction of mouse phantoms from segmented CT scan data for radiation dosimetry studies.

Authors:  D Welch; A D Harken; G Randers-Pehrson; D J Brenner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Organ doses to adult patients for chest CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Alexander Sterzik; Sameer Tipnis; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ambarish Gopal; Song S Mao; Daniel Karlsberg; Emily Young; Joshua Waggoner; Naser Ahmadi; Raveen S Pal; John Leal; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Javier Sanz; Santo Dellegrottaglie; Margherita Milite; Marc Sirol; Milena Henzlova; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Zhang; Tie Liu; Yue Feng; Wei-Feng Wu; Cai-Yun Mou; Li-Hao Zhai
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Few-View Prereconstruction Guided Tube Current Modulation Strategy Based on the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of the Sinogram.

Authors:  Ming Chang; Yongshun Xiao; Zhiqiang Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.238

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.