Literature DB >> 20190310

Mid-term survivorship analysis of a shoulder replacement with a keeled glenoid and a modern cementing technique.

P Kasten1, G Pape, P Raiss, T Bruckner, M Rickert, F Zeifang, M Loew.   

Abstract

We have investigated the mid-term outcome of total shoulder replacement using a keeled cemented glenoid component and a modern cementing technique with regard to the causes of failure and loosening of the components. Between 1997 and 2003 we performed 96 total shoulder replacements on 88 patients, 24 men and 64 women with a mean age of 69.7 years (31 to 82). The minimum follow-up was five years and at the time of review 87 shoulders (77 patients) were examined at a mean follow-up of 89.1 months (60 to 127). Cumulative survival curves were generated with re-operations (accomplished and planned), survivorship of the proshesis, loosening of the glenoid (defined as tilt > 5 degrees or subsidence > 5 mm), the presence of radiolucent lines and a Constant score of < 30 as the endpoints. There were two re-operations not involving revision of the implants and the survival rate of the prosthesis was 100.0% for the follow-up period, with an absolute Constant score of > 30 as the endpoint the survival rate was 98%. Radiological glenoid loosening was 9% after five years, and 33% after nine years. There was an incidence of 8% of radiolucent lines in more than three of six zones in the immediate post-operative period, of 37.0% after the first year which increased to 87.0% after nine years. There was no correlation between the score of Boileau and the total Constant score at the latest follow-up, but there was correlation between glenoid loosening and pain (p = 0.001). We found that total shoulder replacement had an excellent mid-term survivorship and clinical outcome. The surgical and cementing techniques were related to the decrease in radiolucent lines around the glenoid compared with earlier studies. One concern, however, was the fact that radiolucent lines increased over time and there was a rate of glenoid loosening of 9% after five years and 33% after nine years. This suggests that the design of the glenoid component, and the implantation and cementing techniques may need further improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190310     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  21 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): no differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Short stem shoulder prosthesis : concept and first results].

Authors:  M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

9.  Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

Authors:  Mohammad Samim; Mandeep Virk; David Mai; Kamran Munawar; Joseph Zuckerman; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.