Literature DB >> 30328484

Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

Mohammad Samim1, Mandeep Virk2, David Mai2, Kamran Munawar3, Joseph Zuckerman2, Soterios Gyftopoulos3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A major factor that impacts the long-term outcome and complication rates of total shoulder arthroplasty is the preoperative posterior glenoid bone loss quantified by glenoid retroversion. The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid retroversion varies significantly at different glenoid heights in Walch B2 and B3 glenoids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with B2 and B3 glenoid types were included following retrospective review of 386 consecutive CT shoulder studies performed for arthroplasty preoperative planning. True axial CT reconstructions were created using a validated technique. Two readers independently measured the glenoid retroversion angles according to the Friedman method using the "intermediate" glenoid at three glenoid heights: 75% (upper), 50% (equator), and 25% (lower). The variances between the three levels for a given patient were calculated.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine B2 and 8 B3 glenoid types were included. There was no significant difference in variance of glenoid version among the three levels in B2 or B3 groups. The mean variance in retroversion degree between equator-lower, upper-equator, and upper-lower glenoid was - 0.4, 0.3, and - 0.2 for B2; and - 0.2, 1.9, and 1.9 for B3 glenoid, respectively. The level of inter-reader agreement was fair to good for variance at equator-lower, and good to excellent for upper-equator and upper-lower glenoid.
CONCLUSIONS: Glenoid version can be accurately measured at any level between 25 and 75% of glenoid height for Walch B2 and B3. We recommend that the glenoid equator be used as the reference to assure consistent and reliable version measurements in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Glenoid retroversion; Total shoulder arthroplasty; Walch B2 and B3

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30328484     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-3095-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

1.  The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version.

Authors:  R J Friedman; K B Hawthorne; B M Genez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

Authors:  Young W Kwon; Kimerly A Powell; Jae Kwang Yum; John J Brems; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott David Martin; David Zurakowski; Thomas S Thornhill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion.

Authors:  Alain Farron; Alexandre Terrier; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Evaluation of three-dimensional glenoid structure using MRI.

Authors:  H Inui; K Sugamoto; T Miyamoto; A Machida; J Hashimoto; K Nobuhara
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger.

Authors:  John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Charles M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Nimish R Kadakia; Aziz Boulahia; Jean-François Kempf; Pascal Boileau; Chantal Némoz; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and dysplastic glenoid morphology.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Jean-François Kempf; Pascal Boileau; Chantal Némoz; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Glenoid corticocancellous bone grafting after glenoid component removal in the treatment of glenoid loosening.

Authors:  Lionel Neyton; Gilles Walch; Laurent Nové-Josserand; T Bradley Edwards
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  3 in total

1.  Highlights of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) 2018, Austin, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Michael G Fox; Laura W Bancroft
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The use of preoperative planning to decrease costs and increase efficiency in the OR.

Authors:  Bhavya Sheth; Alessia C Lavin; Christian Martinez; Vani J Sabesan
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-25

3.  Glenoid Version Assessment When the CT Field of View Does Not Permit the Friedman Method: The Robertson Method.

Authors:  Douglas D Robertson; Gulshan B Sharma; Patrick J McMahon; Spero G Karas
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.