Literature DB >> 25929691

Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Hwabok Wee1, April D Armstrong1, Wesley W Flint1, Allen R Kunselman2, Gregory S Lewis1.   

Abstract

Aseptic loosening of cemented joint replacements is a complex biological and mechanical process, and remains a clinical concern especially in patients with poor bone quality. Utilizing high resolution finite element analysis of a series of implanted cadaver glenoids, the objective of this study was to quantify relationships between construct morphology and resulting mechanical stresses in cement and trabeculae. Eight glenoid cadavers were implanted with a cemented central peg implant. Specimens were imaged by micro-CT, and subject-specific finite element models were developed. Bone volume fraction, glenoid width, implant-cortex distance, cement volume, cement-cortex contact, and cement-bone interface area were measured. Axial loading was applied to the implant of each model and stress distributions were characterized. Correlation analysis was completed across all specimens for pairs of morphological and mechanical variables. The amount of trabecular bone with high stress was strongly negatively correlated with both cement volume and contact between the cement and cortex (r = -0.85 and -0.84, p < 0.05). Bone with high stress was also correlated with both glenoid width and implant-cortex distance. Contact between the cement and underlying cortex may dramatically reduce trabecular bone stresses surrounding the cement, and this contact depends on bone shape, cement amount, and implant positioning.
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cement morphology; finite element; glenoid implant; implant fixation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929691      PMCID: PMC4591115          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  47 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis.

Authors:  B Couteau; P Mansat; E Estivalèzes; R Darmana; M Mansat; J Egan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification.

Authors:  David Ayers; Kenneth Mann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  3D real-time micromechanical compressive behaviour of bone-cement interface: experimental and finite element studies.

Authors:  Gianluca Tozzi; Qing-Hang Zhang; Jie Tong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; George Calvert; Frank Tull; Douglas McDonald; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effect of glenoid prosthesis design on glenoid bone remodeling: adaptive finite element based simulation.

Authors:  Gulshan B Sharma; Richard E Debski; Patrick J McMahon; Douglas D Robertson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Micro-mechanical modeling of the cement-bone interface: the effect of friction, morphology and material properties on the micromechanical response.

Authors:  Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?

Authors:  Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Finite element analysis of the effect of cementing concepts on implant stability and cement fatigue failure.

Authors:  Dennis Janssen; Jantien van Aken; Thierry Scheerlinck; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses.

Authors:  Qiyuan Mao; Kangning Su; Yuxiao Zhou; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Gregory S Lewis; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 2.  Surface coating of orthopedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of bacterial colonization: a review.

Authors:  Smriti Bohara; Jackrit Suthakorn
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Biomechanical effects of morphological variations of the cortical wall at the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zhang; Guo-Qi Shen; Kun-Peng Zhu; Dong-Xu Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.