Literature DB >> 28916911

Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Florence Dauzère1, Marine Arboucalot1, Julie Lebon1, Fanny Elia1, Nicolas Bonnevialle1, Pierre Mansat2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PERFORM™ pegged glenoid system has been used for shoulder arthroplasty since 2012. This system offers multiple backside curvatures per size to better match variable patient anatomy. As a result, less reaming is required and subchondral bone is preserved-a critical factor in preventing glenoid migration and loosening, thus enhancing implant longevity.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze all radiographic modifications around this new glenoid implant.
METHOD: Thirty-eight shoulders which received the PERFORM™ pegged glenoid component between June 2012 and January 2014 for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were reviewed at two-years minimum follow-up. There were 13 men and 22 women with an average age of 67 years. Humeral components were an uncemented short stem implant in nine (23%) and a resurfacing implant in 29 (77%).
RESULTS: At 27-months average follow-up (24-41), Constant score improved from 30 to 65 points. Range of motion improved significantly at follow-up from 100° to 142° for the anterior elevation, and from 15 to 40° for the external rotation. Radiographic lucent lines (RLL) were observed post-operatively in eight cases (21%), and in 16 cases (42%) at the last follow-up with an increase of the RLL score from 0.36 ± 0.8 to 1.3 ± 2 (p < 0.001) without signs of loosening (RLL > 12). One revision has been performed after anterior shoulder dislocation, rotator cuff tear and glenoid component migration. RLL score was not correlated with dominant side, sex, age, or Constant score. DISCUSSION-
CONCLUSION: The cemented pegged glenoid component with multiple backside curvatures gave satisfactory results at two-years minimum follow-up for up to three years with a low RLL score. Long-term studies are mandatory to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid; Pegged component; Radiolucent lines; Shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916911     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3635-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Pascal Boileau; Daniel Mole; Patrice Adeleine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A ten-year radiologic comparison of two-all polyethylene glenoid component designs: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Aaron K L Tay; Barbara Melis; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Radiographic comparison of two glenoid preparation techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Istvan Szabo; Florent Buscayret; T Bradley Edwards; Chantal Nemoz; Daniel P O'Connor; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Glenoid loosening in response to dynamic multi-axis eccentric loading: a comparison between keeled and pegged designs with an equivalent radial mismatch.

Authors:  C Roche; L Angibaud; P H Flurin; T Wright; Joseph Zuckerman
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2006

5.  Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Terrier; Philippe Büchler; Alain Farron
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location.

Authors:  P Mansat; J Briot; M Mansat; P Swider
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Dominik Meyer; Ralph Sheikh; Bruno J Koller; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Morphology of the normal and arthritic glenoid.

Authors:  Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-31

9.  Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Istvan Szabo; Florent Buscayret; T Bradley Edwards; Chantal Nemoz; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Glenohumeral mismatch affects micromotion of cemented glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vani J Sabesan; Jeffrey Ackerman; Vinay Sharma; Kevin C Baker; Michael D Kurdziel; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Assessment of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the scapula-weighted Constant-Murley score.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Ilaria Parel; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Maria Vittoria Filippi; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Short-stem uncemented anatomical shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis in patients older than 70 years: is it appropriate?

Authors:  Hugo Barret; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Vadim Azoulay; Thomas Baron-Trocellier; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.