Literature DB >> 26630205

Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Gregory S Lewis1, Jacob B Brenza1, Emmanuel M Paul1, April D Armstrong1.   

Abstract

The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of components, and subject to cyclic loading. Five glenoid cadaver bones were implanted with either a three-pegged polyethylene component, or prototype posteriorly augmented component which addresses posterior bone loss. Specimens were loaded by constant glenohumeral compression combined with cyclic anterior-posterior displacement of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. At six time points across 100,000 cycles, implant loosening micromotions were optically measured, and specimens were imaged by micro-computed tomography. Scans were 3D registered and inspected for crack initiation and progression, and micro-CT based time-lapse movies were created. Cement cracking initiated at stress concentrations and progressed with additional cyclic loading. Failure planes within trabecular bone and the bone-cement interface were identified in four of the five specimens. Implant subsidence increased to greater than 1.0 mm in two specimens. Cemented glenoid structural failure can occur within the cement, along planes of trabecular bone, or at the bone cement interface.
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1053-1060, 2016. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glenoid component; implant fixation; implant loosening; micro-computed tomography; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26630205      PMCID: PMC5800522          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  22 in total

1.  Mechanical testing of shoulder prostheses and recommendations for glenoid design.

Authors:  C Anglin; U P Wyss; D R Pichora
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Sunny H Kim; Barton L Wise; Yuqing Zhang; Robert M Szabo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Ralph Sheikh; Todd S Atkinson; Hilaire A C Jacob; Philippe Favre; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Liftoff resistance of augmented glenoid components during cyclic fatigue loading in the posterior-superior direction.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Kyle E Lappin; Conrad L Klotz; Erik W Reber; Steve W Swope
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Initial glenoid component fixation in "reverse" total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Melinda Harman; Mark Frankle; Matt Vasey; Scott Banks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components.

Authors:  Matthew D Budge; Michael D Kurdziel; Kevin C Baker; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Mechanical characteristics of a novel posterior-step prosthesis for biconcave glenoid defects.

Authors:  Yatin M Kirane; Gregory S Lewis; Neil A Sharkey; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Augmented glenoid component for bone deficiency in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert S Rice; John W Sperling; Joseph Miletti; Cathy Schleck; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant.

Authors:  Junaid Sarah; Gupta Sanjay; Sanghavi Sanjay; Anglin Carolyn; Roger Emery; Amis Andrew; Hansen Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.