Literature DB >> 30936954

Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Alessandro Castagna1, Raffaele Garofalo1.   

Abstract

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glenoid; metal back; polyethylene; total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2018        PMID: 30936954      PMCID: PMC6434953          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218790119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  63 in total

1.  Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs.

Authors:  C Anglin; U P Wyss; R W Nyffeler; C Gerber
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement.

Authors:  A L Wallace; R L Phillips; G A MacDougal; W R Walsh; D H Sonnabend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The management of significant glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  R H Bell; J S Noble
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Pascal Boileau; Daniel Mole; Patrice Adeleine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Cyril Avidor; Sumant G Krishnan; Gilles Walch; Jean-François Kempf; Daniel Molé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion.

Authors:  Mark D Lazarus; Kirk L Jensen; Carleton Southworth; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Radiographic analysis of polyethylene glenoid components using modern cementing techniques.

Authors:  Joseph Mileti; N Douglas Boardman; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Michael E Torchia; Shawn W O'driscoll; Charles M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Glenoid cementing may generate sufficient heat to endanger the surrounding bone.

Authors:  R Sean Churchill; Richard S Boorman; Edward V Fehringer; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tom R Norris; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ofer Levy; Stephen A Copeland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; Alexander M Brown; Alexander S Greenstein; Sandeep Mannava; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-24

Review 2.  Do Modern Designs of Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Show Improved Clinical Results in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Fahad Alabdullatif; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Myung Jin Shin; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Erica Kholinne; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Extra-short humeral heads reduce glenohumeral joint overstuffing compared with short heads in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph G Monir; Kevin A Hao; Dilhan Abeyewardene; Kevin J O'Keefe; Joseph J King; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Outcome and revision rate of uncemented humeral head resurfacing: Mid-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Carlo Paglialunga; Greta De Giorgi; Riccardo Proietti; Stefano Carli; Marco Damo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-18

5.  Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Fahad Alabdullatif; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.