Literature DB >> 20161561

The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour, Gavin M Bidelman.   

Abstract

Neural encoding of pitch in the auditory brainstem is shaped by long-term experience with language. The aim herein was to determine to what extent this experience-dependent effect is specific to a particular language. Analysis of variance of brainstem responses to Mandarin and Thai tones revealed that regardless of language identity, pitch-tracking accuracy of whole tones was higher in the two tone language groups (Chinese, Thai) compared to the non-tone language group (English), and that pitch strength of 40-ms tonal sections was generally more robust in tone relative to non-tone languages. Discriminant analysis of tonal sections, as defined by variation in direction and degree of slope, showed that moderate rising pitch was the most important variable for classifying English, Chinese, and Thai participants into their respective groups. We conclude that language-dependent enhancement of pitch representation transfers to other languages with similar phonological systems. From a neurobiological perspective, these findings suggest that neural mechanisms local to the brainstem are tuned for processing pitch dimensions that are perceptually salient depending upon the melodic patterns of a language.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20161561      PMCID: PMC2805250          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  49 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Effects of acetylcholine and atropine on plasticity of central auditory neurons caused by conditioning in bats.

Authors:  W Ji; E Gao; N Suga
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Chao-Yang Lee; Tsun-Hui Hung
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Deficient brainstem encoding in autism.

Authors:  Gary Cloyd Galbraith
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  46 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Linguistic status of timbre influences pitch encoding in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Christopher J Smalt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

4.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2011-12-01

8.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.