Literature DB >> 20160852

Bootstrap methods for simultaneous benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

R Webster West1, Daniela K Nitcheva, Walter W Piegorsch.   

Abstract

A primary objective in quantitative risk assessment is the characterization of risk which is defined to be the likelihood of an adverse effect caused by an environmental toxin or chemcial agent. In modern risk-benchmark analysis, attention centers on the "benchmark dose" at which a fixed benchmark level of risk is achieved, with a lower confidence limits on this dose being of primary interest. In practice, a range of benchmark risks may be under study, so that the individual lower confidence limits on benchmark dose must be corrected for simultaneity in order to maintain a specified overall level of confidence. For the case of quantal data, simultaneous methods have been constructed that appeal to the large sample normality of parameter estimates. The suitability of these methods for use with small sample sizes will be considered. A new bootstrap technique is proposed as an alternative to the large sample methodology. This technique is evaluated via a simulation study and examples from environmental toxicology.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160852      PMCID: PMC2659674          DOI: 10.1007/s10651-007-0073-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat        ISSN: 1352-8505            Impact factor:   1.119


  12 in total

1.  Estimating risk assessment exposure point concentrations when the data are not normal or lognormal.

Authors:  T W Schulz; S Griffin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Limitations to empirical extrapolation studies: the case of BMD ratios.

Authors:  K P Brand; P J Catalano; J K Hammitt; L Rhomberg; J S Evans
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation with quantal response data.

Authors:  Obaid M Al-Saidy; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Daniela K Nitcheva
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Carcinogenic effects of low dietary levels of aflatoxin B1 in rats.

Authors:  G N Wogan; S Paglialunga; P M Newberne
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1974-10

6.  Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses.

Authors:  R L Kodell; R W West
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

8.  Benchmark dose risk assessment for formaldehyde using airflow modeling and a single-compartment, DNA-protein cross-link dosimetry model to estimate human equivalent doses.

Authors:  Paul M Schlosser; Patrick D Lilly; Rory B Conolly; Derek B Janszen; Julie S Kimbell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 9.  Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments.

Authors:  C J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation with binary-data regression models: small-sample and large-sample features.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; John M Grego; Brian Habing; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Adv Appl Stat       Date:  2010-02

2.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.