Literature DB >> 23683057

Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Walter W Piegorsch1,2,3, Hui Xiong4, Rabi N Bhattacharya1,3, Lizhen Lin5.   

Abstract

Estimation of benchmark doses (BMDs) in quantitative risk assessment traditionally is based upon parametric dose-response modeling. It is a well-known concern, however, that if the chosen parametric model is uncertain and/or misspecified, inaccurate and possibly unsafe low-dose inferences can result. We describe a nonparametric approach for estimating BMDs with quantal-response data based on an isotonic regression method, and also study use of corresponding, nonparametric, bootstrap-based confidence limits for the BMD. We explore the confidence limits' small-sample properties via a simulation study, and illustrate the calculations with an example from cancer risk assessment. It is seen that this nonparametric approach can provide a useful alternative for BMD estimation when faced with the problem of parametric model uncertainty.
© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; BMDL; Benchmark analysis; bootstrap confidence limits; dose-response analysis; isotonic regression; toxicological risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683057      PMCID: PMC3752015          DOI: 10.1111/risa.12066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of three methods for calculating confidence intervals for the benchmark dose.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek; Aldert H Piersma; Wout Slob
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Monotonic Bayesian semiparametric benchmark dose analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Wheeler; A John Bailer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Benchmark dose approaches in chemical health risk assessment in relation to number and distress of laboratory animals.

Authors:  Mattias Oberg
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Model averaging using the Kullback information criterion in estimating effective doses for microbial infection and illness.

Authors:  Hojin Moon; Hyun-Joo Kim; James J Chen; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  An adaptive nonparametric method in benchmark analysis for bioassay and environmental studies.

Authors:  Rabi Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 0.870

6.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Confidence limits on one-stage model parameters in benchmark risk assessment.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

8.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  A model-free approach to low-dose extrapolation.

Authors:  D Krewski; D Gaylor; M Szyszkowicz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  bmd: an R package for benchmark dose estimation.

Authors:  Signe M Jensen; Felix M Kluxen; Jens C Streibig; Nina Cedergreen; Christian Ritz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Influence and Action Mechanisms of Governmental Relations Embeddedness for Fostering Green Production Demonstration Household: Evidence from Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Lipeng Li; Apurbo Sarkar; Xi Zhou; Xiuling Ding; Hua Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Historical Context and Recent Advances in Exposure-Response Estimation for Deriving Occupational Exposure Limits.

Authors:  M W Wheeler; R M Park; A J Bailer; C Whittaker
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.