Literature DB >> 15737104

Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Daniela K Nitcheva1, Walter W Piegorsch, R Webster West, Ralph L Kodell.   

Abstract

A primary objective in quantitative risk or safety assessment is characterization of the severity and likelihood of an adverse effect caused by a chemical toxin or pharmaceutical agent. In many cases data are not available at low doses or low exposures to the agent, and inferences at those doses must be based on the high-dose data. A modern method for making low-dose inferences is known as benchmark analysis, where attention centers on the dose at which a fixed benchmark level of risk is achieved. Both upper confidence limits on the risk and lower confidence limits on the "benchmark dose" are of interest. In practice, a number of possible benchmark risks may be under study; if so, corrections must be applied to adjust the limits for multiplicity. In this short note, we discuss approaches for doing so with quantal response data.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15737104     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation with binary-data regression models: small-sample and large-sample features.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; John M Grego; Brian Habing; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Adv Appl Stat       Date:  2010-02

2.  On use of the multistage dose-response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-05

4.  Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action quantal data in quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Confidence limits on one-stage model parameters in benchmark risk assessment.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

6.  Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Walter W Piegorsch; A Grant Schissler; Rachel R McCaster; Susan L Cutter
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.416

7.  Bootstrap methods for simultaneous benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  R Webster West; Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.