Literature DB >> 8187725

Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments.

C J Portier1.   

Abstract

Two-year animal carcinogenicity experiments are used to evaluate the potential carcinogenicity from exposure to chemicals. The choice of exposure levels, the allocation of animals to doses, the length of exposure, and the choice of interim sacrifice times all affect the power of statistical tests for carcinogenic effects and the variance of interpolated estimates of carcinogenic risk. In this paper, one aspect of this problems is considered: the ability of tumor incidence data to provide information on carcinogenic mechanism and the optimal choice of design parameters with which to achieve this purpose. The direct application of biochemical data to the estimation of carcinogenic risk is also discussed in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8187725      PMCID: PMC1566879          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  14 in total

1.  Two-stage models of carcinogenesis, classification of agents, and design of experiments.

Authors:  C J Portier; L Edler
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1990-04

2.  A general probabilistic model of carcinogenesis: analysis of experimental urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  R E Greenfield; L B Ellwein; S M Cohen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Variability of safe dose estimates when using complicated models of the carcinogenic process. A case study: methylene chloride.

Authors:  C J Portier; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1989-10

Review 4.  Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S M Cohen; L B Ellwein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Two-stage models of tumor incidence for historical control animals in the National Toxicology Program's carcinogenicity experiments.

Authors:  C J Portier; A J Bailer
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1989

6.  A cellular dynamics model of experimental bladder cancer: analysis of the effect of sodium saccharin in the rat.

Authors:  L B Ellwein; S M Cohen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  A multistage model of carcinogenesis incorporating DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  C J Portier; A Kopp-Schneider
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of multistep carcinogenesis: relevance to carcinogen risk assessment.

Authors:  J C Barrett; R W Wiseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Model for human carcinogenesis: action of environmental agents.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation with binary-data regression models: small-sample and large-sample features.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; John M Grego; Brian Habing; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Adv Appl Stat       Date:  2010-02

2.  Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-05

3.  Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action quantal data in quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Model Selection and Estimation with Quantal-Response Data in Benchmark Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu; Walter Piegorsch; Ronald W West; LingLing An
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Questioning Existing Cancer Hazard Evaluation Standards in the Name of Statistics.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Confidence limits on one-stage model parameters in benchmark risk assessment.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

8.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.