Literature DB >> 20640219

Maximum likelihood estimation with binary-data regression models: small-sample and large-sample features.

Roland C Deutsch1, John M Grego, Brian Habing, Walter W Piegorsch.   

Abstract

Many inferential procedures for generalized linear models rely on the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Fahrmeir & Kaufmann (1985, Ann. Stat., 13, 1) present mild conditions under which the MLEs in GLiMs are asymptotically normal. Unfortunately, limited study has appeared for the special case of binomial response models beyond the familiar logit and probit links, and for more general links such as the complementary log-log link, and the less well-known complementary log link. We verify the asymptotic normality conditions of the MLEs for these models under the assumption of a fixed number of experimental groups and present a simple set of conditions for any twice differentiable monotone link function. We also study the quality of the approximation for constructing asymptotic Wald confidence regions. Our results show that for small sample sizes with certain link functions the approximation can be problematic, especially for cases where the parameters are close to the boundary of the parameter space.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20640219      PMCID: PMC2903756     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Appl Stat        ISSN: 0972-3617


  8 in total

1.  Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-05

3.  Parameters of a dose-response model are on the boundary: what happens with BMDL?

Authors:  Leonid Kopylev; John Fox
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess; K L Deal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  On tests against one-sided hypotheses in some generalized linear models.

Authors:  M J Silvapulle
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bootstrap methods for simultaneous benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  R Webster West; Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

Review 7.  Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments.

Authors:  C J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin induce differentiation of human myeloid cell lines in synergy with immune interferon.

Authors:  G Trinchieri; M Kobayashi; M Rosen; R Loudon; M Murphy; B Perussia
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1986-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Benchmark dose profiles for joint-action quantal data in quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Roland C Deutsch; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Model Selection and Estimation with Quantal-Response Data in Benchmark Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu; Walter Piegorsch; Ronald W West; LingLing An
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Benchmark dose risk analysis with mixed-factor quantal data in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Maria A Sans-Fuentes; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.527

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.