Literature DB >> 6510615

A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

K S Crump.   

Abstract

The usual method for establishing allowable daily intake (ADI) for a chemical involves determining a no-observed-effect level (NOEL) and applying a safety factor. Even though this method has been used for many years, there appear to be no general guidelines or rules for defining a NOEL. The determination of a NOEL is particularly uncertain for lesions which occur naturally in untreated animals. NOELs also have shortcomings in that smaller experiments tend to give larger values (this should be reversed because larger experiments can provide greater evidence of safety) and that the steepness of the dose response in the dose range where effects occur plays little or no role in the determination of a NOEL. This paper proposes and illustrates the use of a "benchmark dose" (BD) as an alternative to a NOEL. A BD is a statistical lower confidence limit to a dose producing some predetermined increase in response rate such as 0.01 or 0.1. The BD is calculated using a mathematical dose-response model. This approach makes appropriate use of sample size and the shape of the dose-response curve. The BD normally will not depend strongly upon the mathematical model used because the method does not involve extrapolation far below the experimental range. Thus the method sidesteps much of the model dependency often associated with extrapolation of carcinogenicity data to low doses. The method can be applied to either "quantal" data in which only the presence or absence of an effect is recorded, or "continuous" data in which the severity of the effect is also noted.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6510615     DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(84)90107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0272-0590


  104 in total

1.  Predicting low dose effects for chemicals in high through-put studies.

Authors:  Edward J Stanek; Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control.

Authors:  E D Kuempel; V Castranova; C L Geraci; P A Schulte
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  A simple procedure for estimating pseudo risk ratios from exposure to non-carcinogenic chemical mixtures.

Authors:  Franco Scinicariello; Christopher Portier
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Summary of dose-response modeling for developmental toxicity studies.

Authors:  Daniel L Hunt; Shesh N Rai; Chin-Shang Li
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-05

6.  Improving the quality of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicity tests.

Authors:  P F Chapman; M Crane; J Wiles; F Noppert; E McIndoe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Autologistic models for benchmark risk or vulnerability assessment of urban terrorism outcomes.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Walter W Piegorsch; A Grant Schissler; Susan L Cutter
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 8.  Fundamentals and possibilities of classification of occupational substances as developmental toxicants.

Authors:  A Hofmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Renal tubular dysfunction increases mortality in the Japanese general population living in cadmium non-polluted areas.

Authors:  Yasushi Suwazono; Kazuhiro Nogawa; Yuko Morikawa; Muneko Nishijo; Etsuko Kobayashi; Teruhiko Kido; Hideaki Nakagawa; Koji Nogawa
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  The future use of in vitro data in risk assessment to set human exposure standards: challenging problems and familiar solutions.

Authors:  Kenny S Crump; Chao Chen; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.