BACKGROUND: First-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liners have reduced the incidence of wear particle-induced osteolysis. However, failed acetabular liners have shown evidence of surface cracking, mechanical failure, and oxidative damage. This has led to the development of second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene, which has improved wear and mechanical properties and resistance to oxidation in vitro. Owing to its recent introduction, there are no publications describing its clinical performance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed early clinical wear of a second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liner and compared its clinical performance with the published results of hip simulator tests and with first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene annealed liners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Clinical outcome and femoral head penetration were measured for 19 patients at 6 months and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The median proximal head penetration was 0.009 mm and 0.024 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median two-dimensional (2-D) head penetration was 0.083 mm and 0.060 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median proximal wear rate between 1 and 2 years was 0.015 mm/year. CONCLUSIONS: The wear rate calculated was similar to the in vitro wear rate reported for this material; however, it was less than the detection threshold for this technique. Although longer followup is required for wear to reach a clinically quantifiable level, this low level of wear is encouraging for the future clinical performance of this material. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: First-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liners have reduced the incidence of wear particle-induced osteolysis. However, failed acetabular liners have shown evidence of surface cracking, mechanical failure, and oxidative damage. This has led to the development of second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene, which has improved wear and mechanical properties and resistance to oxidation in vitro. Owing to its recent introduction, there are no publications describing its clinical performance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed early clinical wear of a second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liner and compared its clinical performance with the published results of hip simulator tests and with first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene annealed liners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Clinical outcome and femoral head penetration were measured for 19 patients at 6 months and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The median proximal head penetration was 0.009 mm and 0.024 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median two-dimensional (2-D) head penetration was 0.083 mm and 0.060 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median proximal wear rate between 1 and 2 years was 0.015 mm/year. CONCLUSIONS: The wear rate calculated was similar to the in vitro wear rate reported for this material; however, it was less than the detection threshold for this technique. Although longer followup is required for wear to reach a clinically quantifiable level, this low level of wear is encouraging for the future clinical performance of this material. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Xunhua Yuan; Rebecca Perinchief; Johan Kärrholm; Niclas Börlin; Daniel M Estok; William H Harris Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne; David G Chess; Kory D Charron Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Aaron J Johnson; LaQuawn Loving; Lizeth Herrera; Ronald E Delanois; Aiguo Wang; Michael A Mont Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Carmen Zietz; Christian Fabry; Lars Middelborg; Gerhard Fulda; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rainer Bader Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Julio J Jauregui; Qais Naziri; Todd P Pierce; Randa K Elmallah; Jeffrey J Cherian; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Stuart A Callary; Lucian B Solomon; Oksana T Holubowycz; David G Campbell; Zachary Munn; Donald W Howie Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Giorgio Perino; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Seth A Jerabek; Guido Martignoni; Gabrielle Wilner; Dan Maass; Steven R Goldring; P Edward Purdue Journal: BMC Clin Pathol Date: 2014-09-05