Literature DB >> 16768372

Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.

Kathrin Lange1, Brigitte Röder.   

Abstract

Spatial attention affects the processing of stimuli of both a task-relevant and a task-irrelevant modality. The present study investigated if similar cross-modal effects exist when attention is oriented to a point in time. Short (600 msec) and long (1,200 msec) empty intervals, marked by a tactile onset and an auditory or a tactile offset marker, were presented. In each block, the participants had to attend one interval and one modality. Event-related potentials (ERPs) to auditory and tactile offset markers of attended as compared to unattended intervals were characterized by an enhancement of early negative deflections of the auditory and somatosensory ERPs (audition, 100-140 msec; touch, 130-180 msec) when audition or touch was task relevant, respectively. Similar effects were found for auditory stimuli when touch was task relevant. An additional reaction time experiment revealed faster responses to both auditory and tactile stimuli at the attended as compared to the unattended point in time, irrespective of which modality was primary. Both behavioral and ERP data show that attention can be focused on a point in time, which results in a more efficient processing of auditory and tactile stimuli. The ERP data further suggest that a relative enhancement at perceptual processing stages contributes to the processing advantage for temporally attended stimuli. The existence of cross-modal effects of temporal attention underlines the importance of time as a feature for binding input across different modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16768372     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  35 in total

Review 1.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Lori B Astheimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

3.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Age-related changes in orienting attention in time.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Peter Pan; Helen Liu; Jacob Bollinger; Anna C Nobre; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

6.  Cross-modal decoupling in temporal attention between audition and touch.

Authors:  Stefanie Mühlberg; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Intersensory selective attention and temporal orienting operate in parallel and are instantiated in spatially distinct sensory and motor cortices.

Authors:  Ulrich Pomper; Julian Keil; John J Foxe; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.

Authors:  Ahren B Fitzroy; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Event-related potentials index segmentation of nonsense sounds.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Victoria Ameral; Kathryn Sayles
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; Jessica Fanning; Donna Coch; Lisa Sanders; Helen Neville
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.