Literature DB >> 26911682

Temporal Prediction in lieu of Periodic Stimulation.

Benjamin Morillon1, Charles E Schroeder2, Valentin Wyart3, Luc H Arnal4.   

Abstract

Predicting not only what will happen, but also when it will happen is extremely helpful for optimizing perception and action. Temporal predictions driven by periodic stimulation increase perceptual sensitivity and reduce response latencies. At the neurophysiological level, a single mechanism has been proposed to mediate this twofold behavioral improvement: the rhythmic entrainment of slow cortical oscillations to the stimulation rate. However, temporal regularities can occur in aperiodic contexts, suggesting that temporal predictions per se may be dissociable from entrainment to periodic sensory streams. We investigated this possibility in two behavioral experiments, asking human participants to detect near-threshold auditory tones embedded in streams whose temporal and spectral properties were manipulated. While our findings confirm that periodic stimulation reduces response latencies, in agreement with the hypothesis of a stimulus-driven entrainment of neural excitability, they further reveal that this motor facilitation can be dissociated from the enhancement of auditory sensitivity. Perceptual sensitivity improvement is unaffected by the nature of temporal regularities (periodic vs aperiodic), but contingent on the co-occurrence of a fulfilled spectral prediction. Altogether, the dissociation between predictability and periodicity demonstrates that distinct mechanisms flexibly and synergistically operate to facilitate perception and action.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/362342-06$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory perception; behavior; oscillation; prediction; psychophysics; rhythm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26911682      PMCID: PMC4860448          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0836-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays.

Authors:  Mari Riess Jones; Heather Moynihan; Noah MacKenzie; Jennifer Puente
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

2.  Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Anna Christina Nobre; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Temporal predictions based on a gradual change in tempo.

Authors:  Thomas E Cope; Manon Grube; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; George Karmos; Ashesh D Mehta; Istvan Ulbert; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Hajnal Jolsvai; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Predictive motor control of sensory dynamics in auditory active sensing.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Troy A Hackett; Yoshinao Kajikawa; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations.

Authors:  Ruud Wetzels; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

10.  Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy.

Authors:  Harriet Feldman; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  33 in total

1.  V1 microcircuit dynamics: altered signal propagation suggests intracortical origins for adaptation in response to visual repetition.

Authors:  Jacob A Westerberg; Michele A Cox; Kacie Dougherty; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Rhythmic motor behaviour influences perception of visual time.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Tiziana Vercillo; Francesco Torricelli; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neural mechanisms of rhythm-based temporal prediction: Delta phase-locking reflects temporal predictability but not rhythmic entrainment.

Authors:  Assaf Breska; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 4.  When brain rhythms aren't 'rhythmic': implication for their mechanisms and meaning.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Periodicity versus Prediction in Sensory Perception.

Authors:  Vani G Rajendran; Sundeep Teki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Impaired auditory-to-motor entrainment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Erik S Te Woerd; Robert Oostenveld; Floris P de Lange; Peter Praamstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The rhythm aftereffect induced by adaptation to the decelerating rhythm.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Kun Wang; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-04

9.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Thomas Thesen; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Anna C Nobre; Charles E Schroeder; Karl J Friston; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.