Literature DB >> 16039144

Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models.

Blaise Yvert1, Catherine Fischer, Olivier Bertrand, Jacques Pernier.   

Abstract

While source localization methods are increasingly developed to identify brain areas underlying scalp electro/magnetoencephalographic data (EEG/MEG), these methods have not yet been used to identify the sources of intracerebral signals which offer highly detailed information. Here, we adapted the minimum current estimates method to intracranial data in order to localize supratemporal sources of intracerebral auditory 1-kHz-tone-evoked potentials occurring within 100 ms after stimulus onset. After an evaluation of localization method and despite inter-subject variability, we found a common spatiotemporal pattern of activities, which involved the first Heschl's gyrus (H1) and sulcus (HS), the Planum Temporale (PT), H2/H3 when present, and the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Four time periods of activity were distinguished, corresponding to the time range of the scalp components P0, Na, Pa/Pb, and N100. The sources of the earliest components P0 (16-19 ms) and Na (20-25 ms) could be identified in the postero-medial portion of HS or H1. Then, several areas became simultaneously active after 25 ms. The Pa/Pb time range (30-50 ms) was characterized by a medio-lateral and postero-anterior propagation of activity over the supratemporal plane involving successively H1/HS, the Planum Temporale, H2/H3 when present, and the STG. Finally, we found to a large extent that the N100 (55-100 ms) involved almost the same areas as those active during the Pa/Pb complex, with a similar propagation of activities. Reconstructing scalp data from these sources on fictive EEG/MEG channels reproduced classical auditory evoked waveforms and topographies. In conclusion, the spatiotemporal pattern of activation of supratemporal auditory areas could be identified on the individual anatomy using current estimates from intracerebral data. Such detailed localization approach could also be used prior to epilepsy surgery to help identify epileptogenic foci and preserve functional cortical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16039144     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  43 in total

1.  Intrinsic dendritic filtering gives low-pass power spectra of local field potentials.

Authors:  Henrik Lindén; Klas H Pettersen; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Larry E Roberts; Lee M Miller; Kelly L McDonald; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Magnetic sources of the M50 response are localized to frontal cortex.

Authors:  E Garcia-Rill; K Moran; J Garcia; W M Findley; K Walton; B Strotman; R R Llinas
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Intracranial recording and source localization of auditory brain responses elicited at the 50 ms latency in three children aged from 3 to 16 years.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Eishi Asano; Valentina Gumenyuk; Csaba Juhász; Michael Wagner; Robert D Rothermel; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Michael Wagner; Curtis W Ponton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values.

Authors:  David Tomé; Fernando Barbosa; Kamila Nowak; João Marques-Teixeira
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

8.  Functional localization of auditory cortical fields of human: click-train stimulation.

Authors:  John F Brugge; Igor O Volkov; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Richard A Reale; Albert Fenoy; Mitchell Steinschneider; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; V Gumenyuk; J Grushko; K Lawson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Abnormal auditory N100 amplitude: a heritable endophenotype in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Tiffany A Greenwood; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Dorcas J Dobie; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; James Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Debby W Tsuang; Ming T Tsuang; Monica E Calkins
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.