Literature DB >> 7878167

Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

G R Mangun1.   

Abstract

Visual selective attention improves our perception and performance by modifying sensory inputs at an early stage of processing. Spatial attention produces the most consistent early modulations of visual processing, which can be observed when attention is voluntarily allocated to locations. These effects of spatial attention are similar when attention is cued in a trial-by-trial, or sustained, fashion and are manifest as changes in the amplitudes, but not the latencies, of evoked neural activity recorded from the intact human scalp. This modulation of sensory processing first occurs within the extrastriate visual cortex and not within the striate or earlier subcortical processing stages. These relatively early spatial filters alter the inputs to higher stages of visual analysis that are responsible for feature extraction and ultimately object perception and recognition, and thus provide physiological evidence for early precategorical selection during visual attention. Moreover, the physiological evidence extends early selection theories by providing neurophysiologically precise information about the stages of visual processing affected by attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7878167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  173 in total

1.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Antígona Martínez; Martin I Sereno; Sabrina Pitzalis; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; G R Mangun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Assessment of the state of activation of the cortical zones in humans during visual attention and selection.

Authors:  I N Baranov-Krylov; I E Kanunikov; V T Shuvaev; D N Berlov; N A Kavshbaya
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06

4.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying the higher levels of subjective well-being in extraverts: pleasant bias and unpleasant resistance.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Jinfu Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Jiemin Yang; Xianxin Meng; Qinglin Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Siri-Maria Kamp; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies.

Authors:  Jesse J Bengson; Javier Lopez-Calderon; George R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes.

Authors:  John R Fedota; Craig G McDonald; Daniel M Roberts; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.