Literature DB >> 20144492

Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging.

Wesley C Clapp1, Adam Gazzaley.   

Abstract

Interference is known to negatively impact the ability to maintain information in working memory (WM), an effect that is exacerbated with aging. Here, we explore how distinct sources of interference, i.e., distraction (stimuli to-be-ignored) and interruption (stimuli requiring attention), differentially influence WM in younger and older adults. EEG was recorded while participants engaged in three versions of a delayed-recognition task: no interference, a distracting stimulus, and an interrupting stimulus presented during WM maintenance. Behaviorally, both types of interference negatively impacted WM accuracy in older adults significantly more than younger adults (with a larger deficit for interruptions). N170 latency measures revealed that the degree of processing both distractors and interruptors predicted WM accuracy in both populations. However, while WM impairments could be explained by excessive attention to distractors by older adults (a suppression deficit), impairment induced by interruption were not clearly mediated by age-related increases in attention to interruptors. These results suggest that distinct underlying mechanisms mediate the impact of different types of external interference on WM in normal aging.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20144492      PMCID: PMC2891289          DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Aging        ISSN: 0197-4580            Impact factor:   4.673


  72 in total

1.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children.

Authors:  M J Taylor; G E Edmonds; G McCarthy; T Allison
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex.

Authors:  Jong H Yoon; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Regional specificity and practice: dynamic changes in object and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Susan M Landau; Hugh Garavan; Eric H Schumacher; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Aging and a benefit of distractibility.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; Lynn Rasher; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A neural basis for expert object recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; T Curran
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

9.  Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.

Authors:  Alex Chaparro; Joanne M Wood; Trent Carberry
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Age-related deficits in component processes of working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Margaret A Sheridan; Jeffrey W Cooney; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  44 in total

1.  A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions.

Authors:  Jacki Janowich; Jyoti Mishra; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Neural sources of performance decline during continuous multitasking.

Authors:  Omar Al-Hashimi; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Deficit in switching between functional brain networks underlies the impact of multitasking on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Low perceived control as a risk factor for episodic memory: the mediational role of anxiety and task interference.

Authors:  Margie E Lachman; Stefan Agrigoroaei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

6.  Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems.

Authors:  T P Zanto; W C Clapp; M T Rubens; J Karlsson; A Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of visual distraction on retrieval of long-term memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Michael T Rubens; Jacqueline Boccanfuso; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging.

Authors:  Nathan Cashdollar; Keisuke Fukuda; Angelika Bocklage; Sara Aurtenetxe; Edward K Vogel; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-10-15

10.  Cholinergic enhancement of functional networks in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Judy Pa; Anne S Berry; Mariana Compagnone; Jacqueline Boccanfuso; Ian Greenhouse; Michael T Rubens; Julene K Johnson; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.