Literature DB >> 25577575

Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems.

T P Zanto1, W C Clapp1, M T Rubens1, J Karlsson1, A Gazzaley1.   

Abstract

Many aspects of the complex relationship between working memory (WM) and long-term memory (LTM) remain unclear. Here, we manipulated task demands on a brief delayed-recognition paradigm to reveal behavioral and neural dissociations between these systems. Variations from a Baseline task included 3 challenges: increased delay duration, distraction during maintenance, and more closely matched memory probes, which were presented in behavioral experiments and during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Each of the challenges resulted in a significant decline in WM accuracy, and interestingly, a concurrent improvement in incidental LTM. Neural data revealed that, in task blocks, when participants anticipated, and then experienced, increased demands, they engaged medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions more during both the encoding and delay periods. Overall, these results indicate that distinct memory systems are recruited based on anticipated demands of a memory task, and MTL involvement underlies the observed dissociation between WM and LTM performance.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delayed recognition; fMRI; medial temporal lobe; prefrontal cortex; task difficulty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25577575      PMCID: PMC4737608          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  62 in total

1.  An expectation-based memory deficit in aging.

Authors:  Jacob Bollinger; Michael T Rubens; Edrick Masangkay; Jonathan Kalkstein; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Yael Shrager; Nicole M Dudukovic; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neuroimaging the serial position curve. A test of single-store versus dual-store models.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Cheryl L Grady; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-09

7.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions.

Authors:  E Zarahn; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Expectation-driven changes in cortical functional connectivity influence working memory and long-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jacob Bollinger; Michael T Rubens; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Michael T Rubens; Arul Thangavel; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Memory for non-painful auditory items is influenced by whether they are experienced in a context involving painful electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Keith M Vogt; Caroline M Norton; Lauren E Speer; Joshua J Tremel; James W Ibinson; Lynne M Reder; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory.

Authors:  Alexandra B Morrison; Gail M Rosenbaum; Damien Fair; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

4.  Are visual working memory and episodic memory distinct processes? Insight from stroke patients by lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Selma Lugtmeijer; Linda Geerligs; Frank Erik de Leeuw; Edward H F de Haan; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 5.  Short-term memory for spatial, sequential and duration information.

Authors:  Sanjay G Manohar; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-10

6.  Refresh my memory: Episodic memory reinstatements intrude on working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Abigail N Hoskin; Aaron M Bornstein; Kenneth A Norman; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.