Literature DB >> 17916334

Regional specificity and practice: dynamic changes in object and spatial working memory.

Susan M Landau1, Hugh Garavan, Eric H Schumacher, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) tasks engage a network of brain regions that includes primary, unimodal, and multimodal associative cortices. Little is known, however, about whether task practice influences these types of regions differently. In this experiment, we used event-related fMRI to examine practice-related activation changes in different region types over the course of a scanning session while participants performed a delayed-recognition task. The task contained separate WM processing stages (encoding, maintenance, retrieval) and different materials (object, spatial), which allowed us to investigate the influence of practice on different component processes. We observed significant monotonic decreases, and not increases, in fMRI signal primarily in unimodal and multimodal regions. These decreases occurred during WM encoding and retrieval, but not during maintenance. Finally, regions specific to the type of memoranda (e.g., spatial or object) showed a lesser degree of sensitivity to practice as compared to regions activated by both types of memoranda, suggesting that these regions may be specialized more for carrying out processing within a particular modality than for experience-related flexibility. Overall, these findings indicate that task practice does not have a uniform effect on stages of WM processing, the type of WM memoranda being processed or on different types of brain regions. Instead, regions engaged during WM encoding and retrieval may have greater capacity for functional plasticity than WM maintenance. Additionally, the degree of specialization within brain regions may determine processing efficiency. Unimodal and multimodal regions that participate in both object and spatial processing may be specialized for flexible experience-related change, while those supporting primary sensorimotor processing may operate at optimal efficiency and are less susceptible to practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17916334      PMCID: PMC2100391          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  39 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent.

Authors:  Seema Sayala; Joseph B Sala; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Functional organization of spatial and nonspatial working memory processing within the human lateral frontal cortex.

Authors:  A M Owen; C E Stern; R B Look; I Tracey; B R Rosen; M Petrides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions.

Authors:  E Zarahn; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Automaticity, resources, and memory: theoretical controversies and practical implications.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 8.  A neural system for human visual working memory.

Authors:  L G Ungerleider; S M Courtney; J V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Intelligence and individual differences in becoming neurally efficient.

Authors:  Aljoscha C Neubauer; Roland H Grabner; H Harald Freudenthaler; Jens F Beckmann; Jürgen Guthke
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-05

Review 10.  From sensation to cognition.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal effects following working memory training.

Authors:  Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi; John Jonides
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Austin L Boroshok; Anne T Park; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Gerardo H Velasquez; Ursula A Tooley; Katrina R Simon; Jasmine C P Forde; Lourdes M Delgado Reyes; M Dylan Tisdall; Dani S Bassett; Emily A Cooper; Allyson P Mackey
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  Intensive Working Memory Training Produces Functional Changes in Large-scale Frontoparietal Networks.

Authors:  Todd W Thompson; Michael L Waskom; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Case-Based fMRI Analysis after Cognitive Rehabilitation in MS: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Martina Hubacher; Ludwig Kappos; Katrin Weier; Markus Stöcklin; Klaus Opwis; Iris-Katharina Penner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Task-dependent individual differences in prefrontal connectivity.

Authors:  Bharat B Biswal; Dana A Eldreth; Michael A Motes; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  How should we measure chunks? a continuing issue in chunking research and a way forward.

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-25

10.  Learning by task repetition enhances object individuation and memorization in the elderly.

Authors:  Chiara F Tagliabue; Sara Assecondi; Giulia Cristoforetti; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.