Literature DB >> 16226895

Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex.

Jong H Yoon1, Clayton E Curtis, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

Maintaining relevant information for later use is a critical aspect of working memory (WM). The lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior sensory cortical areas appear to be important in supporting maintenance. However, the relative and unique contributions of these areas remain unclear. We have designed a WM paradigm with distraction to probe the contents of maintenance representations in these regions. During delayed recognition trials of faces, selective interference was evident behaviorally with face distraction leading to significantly worse performance than with scene distraction. Event-related fMRI of the human brain showed that maintenance activity in the lateral PFC, but not in visual association cortex (VAC), was selectively disrupted by face distraction. Additionally, the functional connectivity between the lateral PFC and the VAC was perturbed during these trials. We propose a hierarchical and distributed model of active maintenance in which the lateral PFC codes for abstracted mnemonic information, while sensory areas represent specific features of the memoranda. Furthermore, persistent coactivation between the PFC and sensory areas may be a mechanism by which information is actively maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226895     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  51 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Dopamine and frontostriatal networks in cognitive aging.

Authors:  Ellen C Klostermann; Meredith N Braskie; Susan M Landau; James P O'Neil; William J Jagust
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions.

Authors:  Jacki Janowich; Jyoti Mishra; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Derek E Nee; Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  From cognitive to neural models of working memory.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Impaired prefrontal functional connectivity associated with working memory task performance and disorganization despite intact activations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sripriya Chari; Michael J Minzenberg; Marjorie Solomon; J Daniel Ragland; Quynh Nguyen; Cameron S Carter; Jong H Yoon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Dynamic adjustments in prefrontal, hippocampal, and inferior temporal interactions with increasing visual working memory load.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Regional brain differences in the effect of distraction during the delay interval of a working memory task.

Authors:  Florin Dolcos; Brian Miller; Philip Kragel; Amishi Jha; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of selective representation of visual working memory in ventral temporal and occipital regions.

Authors:  Xufeng Han; Alexander C Berg; Hwamee Oh; Dimitris Samaras; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Evidence for working memory storage operations in perceptual cortex.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Caterina Gratton; Jason Vytlacil; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.