BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements obtained from the DexCom SEVEN system with Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) laboratory measurements of venous blood glucose. METHODS: Seventy-two subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes, aged 18-71, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective single-arm study. All participants wore the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for one, 7-day wear period. Calibration with capillary finger stick measurements was performed 2 hours after sensor insertion and once every 12 hours thereafter. A subset of subjects (28) wore two systems simultaneously to assess precision. All subjects participated in one, 10-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 of the study to compare CGM measurements against a laboratory method (YSI analyzer) using venous measurements taken once every 20 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing were adjusted in order to obtain a broad range of glucose values. RESULTS: Comparison of CGM measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 2318) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 16.7 and 13.2%, respectively. The percentage was 70.4% in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone and 27.5% in the benign error B zone. Performance of the SEVEN system was consistent over time with mean and median ARD lowest on day 7 as compared to YSI (13.3 and 10.2%, respectively). Average sensor time lag was 5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the DexCom SEVEN system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 7 days of wear. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements obtained from the DexCom SEVEN system with Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) laboratory measurements of venous blood glucose. METHODS: Seventy-two subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes, aged 18-71, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective single-arm study. All participants wore the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for one, 7-day wear period. Calibration with capillary finger stick measurements was performed 2 hours after sensor insertion and once every 12 hours thereafter. A subset of subjects (28) wore two systems simultaneously to assess precision. All subjects participated in one, 10-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 of the study to compare CGM measurements against a laboratory method (YSI analyzer) using venous measurements taken once every 20 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing were adjusted in order to obtain a broad range of glucose values. RESULTS: Comparison of CGM measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 2318) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 16.7 and 13.2%, respectively. The percentage was 70.4% in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone and 27.5% in the benign error B zone. Performance of the SEVEN system was consistent over time with mean and median ARD lowest on day 7 as compared to YSI (13.3 and 10.2%, respectively). Average sensor time lag was 5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the DexCom SEVEN system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 7 days of wear. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.
Authors: H Peter Chase; Mary D Roberts; Clare Wightman; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Satish K Garg; Michelle Van Wyhe; Shashi Desai; Wesley Harper; Margarita Lopatin; Miroslaw Bartkowiak; Janet Tamada; Richard C Eastman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: R Schiaffini; P Ciampalini; A Fierabracci; S Spera; P Borrelli; G F Bottazzo; A Crinò Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: D Barry Keenan; Benyamin Grosman; Harry W Clark; Anirban Roy; Stuart A Weinzimer; Rajiv V Shah; John J Mastrototaro Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-11-01
Authors: Linda Morrow; Marcus Hompesch; Ann M Tideman; Jennifer Matson; Nancy Dunne; Scott Pardo; Joan L Parkes; Holly C Schachner; David A Simmons Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2016-05-03