Literature DB >> 14633343

The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) accuracy study.

.   

Abstract

The accuracy of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System, CGMS (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) was assessed in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) when compared with reference serum glucose levels during spontaneous fluctuations in glucose levels over 24 h and during acute hyper- and hypoglycemia. Ninety-one subjects with type 1 diabetes (3.5-17.7 years old) wore one or two CGMSs while blood samples were obtained for serum glucose determinations (made at a central laboratory) hourly during the day, every 30 min overnight, and every 5 min during meal-induced hyperglycemia and insulin-induced hypoglycemia tests, resulting in 6778 CGMS-reference glucose pairs. CGMS function was assessed on each of the 3 days of sensor life. The median relative absolute difference (RAD) between the CGMS and reference values was 18% (25th, 75th percentiles = 8%, 34%). Similar results were obtained on each of the 3 days of sensor life. Accuracy was worse during hypoglycemia than during hyperglycemia. Modified sensors that first became available in November 2002 were more accurate than were the original sensors (median RAD = 11% vs. 19%) and had better precision (r = 0.92 vs. r = 0.77) during time periods in which two CGMSs were simultaneously used. The CGMS sensors that have been in clinical use until recently are often inaccurate in quantifying glucose values in children with T1DM. However, recent modifications to the sensor have resulted in substantially better accuracy and reliability. This improved function, if confirmed by additional data, may enhance the clinical utility of the CGMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14633343      PMCID: PMC2249698          DOI: 10.1089/152091503322526987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  14 in total

1.  Efficacy and reliability of the continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  T M Gross; J J Mastrototaro
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring in previously unstudied population subgroups.

Authors:  T M Gross; A Ter Veer
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Francine Ratner Kaufman; Juliana Austin; Aaron Neinstein; Lily Jeng; Mary Halvorson; Debra J Devoe; Pisit Pitukcheewanont
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use.

Authors:  T M Gross; B W Bode; D Einhorn; D M Kayne; J H Reed; N H White; J J Mastrototaro
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  E Boland; T Monsod; M Delucia; C A Brandt; S Fernando; W V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Hypoglycemia prevalence in prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes on standard insulin regimen: use of continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Rakesh Amin; Karen Ross; Carlo L Acerini; Julie A Edge; Justin Warner; David B Dunger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.

Authors:  Bruno Guerci; Michèle Floriot; Philip Böhme; Danielle Durain; Muriel Benichou; Stéphanie Jellimann; Pierre Drouin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Reproducibility of glucose measurements using the glucose sensor.

Authors:  Muriel Metzger; Gil Leibowitz; Julio Wainstein; Benjamin Glaser; Itamar Raz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician.

Authors:  Svein Skeie; Geir Thue; Kari Nerhus; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Spurious reporting of nocturnal hypoglycemia by CGMS in patients with tightly controlled type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Kilty McGowan; William Thomas; Antoinette Moran
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  39 in total

1.  Effect of short-term use of a continuous glucose monitoring system with a real-time glucose display and a low glucose alarm on incidence and duration of hypoglycemia in a home setting in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Raymond J Davey; Timothy W Jones; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 2.  Toward closing the loop: an update on insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Tandy Aye; Jen Block; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors.

Authors:  Craig Kollman; Darrell M Wilson; Tim Wysocki; William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Response to nocturnal alarms using a real-time glucose sensor.

Authors:  Bruce Buckingham; Jen Block; Jonathan Burdick; Andrea Kalajian; Craig Kollman; Michael Choy; Darrell M Wilson; Peter Chase
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Evaluation of factors affecting CGMS calibration.

Authors:  Bruce A Buckingham; Craig Kollman; Roy Beck; Andrea Kalajian; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Michael J Tansey; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Stuart A Weinzimer; Katrina J Ruedy; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Resting and exercise-induced IL-6 levels in children with Type 1 diabetes reflect hyperglycemic profiles during the previous 3 days.

Authors:  Jaime S Rosa; Rebecca L Flores; Stacy R Oliver; Andria M Pontello; Frank P Zaldivar; Pietro R Galassetti
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-10

7.  Letter to the editor. A study that glucose control can be achieved in 31 type 1 patients who follow a controlled diet and use an insulin pump that is programmed.

Authors:  John Walsh; Ruth Roberts
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07

8.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the clinical setting: the good, the bad, and the practical.

Authors:  Irene Mamkin; Svetlana Ten; Sonal Bhandari; Neesha Ramchandani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09

9.  Accuracy of the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring system: comparison with frequently sampled venous glucose measurements.

Authors:  Howard C Zisser; Timothy S Bailey; Sherwyn Schwartz; Robert E Ratner; Jonathan Wise
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

10.  Self-reported discrimination, diabetes distress, and continuous blood glucose in women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Julie A Wagner; Howard Tennen; Richard Feinn; Chandra Y Osborn
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.