Literature DB >> 24732069

Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Kyle P Walsh1, Edward G Pasanen2, Dennis McFadden2.   

Abstract

In this study, a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE, was used to measure cochlear responses from human subjects while they simultaneously performed behavioral tasks requiring, or not requiring, selective auditory attention. Appended to each stimulus presentation, and included in the calculation of each nSFOAE response, was a 30-ms silent period that was used to estimate the level of the inherent physiological noise in the ear canals of our subjects during each behavioral condition. Physiological-noise magnitudes were higher (noisier) for all subjects in the inattention task, and lower (quieter) in the selective auditory-attention tasks. These noise measures initially were made at the frequency of our nSFOAE probe tone (4.0 kHz), but the same attention effects also were observed across a wide range of frequencies. We attribute the observed differences in physiological-noise magnitudes between the inattention and attention conditions to different levels of efferent activation associated with the differing attentional demands of the behavioral tasks. One hypothesis is that when the attentional demand is relatively great, efferent activation is relatively high, and a decrease in the gain of the cochlear amplifier leads to lower-amplitude cochlear activity, and thus a smaller measure of noise from the ear.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732069      PMCID: PMC4036535          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  62 in total

1.  Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W H Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Further observations of the efferent cochlear bundle.

Authors:  G L RASMUSSEN
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1953-08       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds; S Pierce
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

6.  Differential effects of visual attention on spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C Meric; L Collet
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Low frequency sounds from sustained contraction of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  G Oster; J S Jaffe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The Association Between Physiological Noise Levels and Speech Understanding in Noise.

Authors:  Samantha Stiepan; Jonathan Siegel; Jungwha Lee; Pamela Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cochlear activity in silent cue-target intervals shows a theta-rhythmic pattern and is correlated to attentional alpha and theta modulations.

Authors:  Moritz Herbert Albrecht Köhler; Gianpaolo Demarchi; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Cochlear Delay and Medial Olivocochlear Functioning in Children with Suspected Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Chris Allan; Prudence Allen; David Purcell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Role of Active Listening and Listening Effort on Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacousic Emissions.

Authors:  Mohan Kumar Kalaiah; Nikhitha B Theruvan; Kaushlendra Kumar; Jayashree S Bhat
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-03-30

10.  The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing.

Authors:  Kurtis G Gruters; David L K Murphy; Cole D Jenson; David W Smith; Christopher A Shera; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.