Literature DB >> 25994703

Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Kyle P Walsh1, Edward G Pasanen1, Dennis McFadden1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) measured during behavioral tasks can have different magnitudes when subjects are attending selectively or not attending. The implication is that the cognitive and perceptual demands of a task can affect the first neural stage of auditory processing-the sensory receptors themselves. However, the directions of the reported attentional effects have been inconsistent, the magnitudes of the observed differences typically have been small, and comparisons across studies have been made difficult by significant procedural differences. In this study, a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE, was used to measure cochlear responses from human subjects while they simultaneously performed behavioral tasks requiring selective auditory attention (dichotic or diotic listening), selective visual attention, or relative inattention. Within subjects, the differences in nSFOAE magnitude between inattention and attention conditions were about 2-3 dB for both auditory and visual modalities, and the effect sizes for the differences typically were large for both nSFOAE magnitude and phase. These results reveal that the cochlear efferent reflex is differentially active during selective attention and inattention, for both auditory and visual tasks, although they do not reveal how attention is improved when efferent activity is greater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25994703      PMCID: PMC4441704          DOI: 10.1121/1.4919350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Evidence for direct cortical innervation of medial olivocochlear neurones in rats.

Authors:  W H Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W H Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Further observations of the efferent cochlear bundle.

Authors:  G L RASMUSSEN
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1953-08       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans.

Authors:  S Maison; C Micheyl; L Collet
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  A novel cholinergic "slow effect" of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.

Authors:  T S Sridhar; M C Liberman; M C Brown; W F Sewell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C Ferber-Viart; R Duclaux; L Collet; F Guyonnard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-06

7.  Differential effects of visual attention on spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C Meric; L Collet
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Auditory selective attention in the human cochlea.

Authors:  M H Giard; L Collet; P Bouchet; J Pernier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  16 in total

1.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

3.  Evaluation of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions in Bharatanatyam Dancers and Non-Dancers.

Authors:  Joel Joseph; Ankita Suman; G K Jayasree; Prashanth Prabhu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 4.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Tuan Q Lam; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Cochlear activity in silent cue-target intervals shows a theta-rhythmic pattern and is correlated to attentional alpha and theta modulations.

Authors:  Moritz Herbert Albrecht Köhler; Gianpaolo Demarchi; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 9.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

10.  Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Rafal Milner; Lukasz Olszewski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.