Literature DB >> 1860995

A review of otoacoustic emissions.

R Probst1, B L Lonsbury-Martin, G K Martin.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions measured in the external ear canal describe responses that the cochlea generates in the form of acoustic energy. For the convenience of discussing their principal features, emitted responses can be classified into several categories according to the type of stimulation used to evoke them. On this basis, four distinct but interrelated classes can be distinguished including spontaneous, transiently evoked, stimulus-frequency, and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. The present review details the findings that have been described for each emission type according to this classification schema. Additionally, the known features of emitted responses are discussed for both normally hearing and hearing-impaired humans and experimental animals, and with respect to their potential clinical applications. The findings reviewed here clearly indicate that future studies of otoacoustic emissions will significantly increase our understanding of the basic mechanisms of cochlear function while, at the same time, provide a new and important clinical tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1860995     DOI: 10.1121/1.400897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  95 in total

1.  A fast recursive-least-squares adaptive notch filter and its applications to biomedical signals.

Authors:  W K Ma; Y T Zhang; F S Yang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards.

Authors:  G A Manley; D L Kirk; C Köppl; G K Yates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Authors:  Renato Nobili; Ales Vetesnik; Lorenzo Turicchia; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

5.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Paired measurements of cochlear function and hair cell count in Dutch-belted rabbits with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Holly M Johnson; Mark A Berryman; Soichi Tanda; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.