Literature DB >> 20127102

Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise.

Andrea Bohnert1, Myriel Nyffeler, Annerose Keilmann.   

Abstract

A multichannel non-linear frequency compression algorithm was evaluated in comparison to conventional amplification hearing aids using a test of speech understanding in noise (Oldenburger Satztest-OLSA) and subjective questionnaires. The new algorithm compresses frequencies above a pre-calculated cut off frequency and shifts them to a lower frequency range, thereby providing high-frequency audibility. Low-frequencies, below the compression cut off frequency, are amplified normally. This algorithm is called SoundRecover (SR). In this study, 11 experienced hearing aid users with a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss were tested. Seven subjects showed enhanced levels of understanding in noise (OLSA) using frequency compression. However, 4 out of the 11 subjects could not benefit from the high-frequency gain. Evaluation using questionnaires demonstrated an increased level of satisfaction after 2 months of experimental devices wearing (p = 0.08) and after 4 months of wearing (p = 0.09), respectively, compared to conventional hearing instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20127102     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.

Authors:  H J McDermott; M R Dean; H Dillon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1999

2.  Preliminary results with the AVR ImpaCt frequency-transposing hearing aid.

Authors:  H J McDermott; M R Knight
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 3.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.

Authors:  T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Three experiments on frequency transposition.

Authors:  D Ling
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1968-03

6.  The acceptability of spectrum-preserving and spectrum-destroying transposition to severely hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M Velmans; M Marcuson
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1983-02

7.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

Review 8.  The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Andrea L Pittman; Brenda M Hoover; Dawna E Lewis; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

9.  Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children.

Authors:  Andrea L Pittman; Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  Coherence masking protection for mid-frequency formants by adults and children.

Authors:  Eric Tarr; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Authors:  Vijay Parsa; Susan Scollie; Danielle Glista; Andreas Seelisch
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

4.  [Effect of frequency compression in hearing aids on speech intelligibility and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  M Leifholz; S Margolf-Hackl; S Kreikemeier; J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James Shehorn; Nicole Marrone; Thomas Muller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Emily Bates; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Marc A Brennan; Brenda Hoover; Judy Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Joshua Alexander; Marc A Brennan; Brenda Hoover; Judy Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Judy G Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.

Authors:  Benjamin James Kirby; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.