Literature DB >> 14696992

Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children.

Andrea L Pittman1, Patricia G Stelmachowicz, Dawna E Lewis, Brenda M Hoover.   

Abstract

This study examined the long- and short-term spectral characteristics of speech simultaneously recorded at the ear and at a reference microphone position (30 cm at 0 degrees azimuth). Twenty adults and 26 children (2-4 years of age) with normal hearing were asked to produce 9 short sentences in a quiet environment. Long-term average speech spectra (LTASS) were calculated for the concatenated sentences, and short-term spectra were calculated for selected phonemes within the sentences (/m/, /n/, /s/, [see text], /f/, /a/, /u/, and /i/). Relative to the reference microphone position, the LTASS at the ear showed higher amplitudes for frequencies below 1 kHz and lower amplitudes for frequencies above 2 kHz for both groups. At both microphone positions, the short-term spectra of the children's phonemes revealed reduced amplitudes for /s/ and [see text] and for vowel energy above 2 kHz relative to the adults' phonemes. The results of this study suggest that, for listeners with hearing loss (a) the talker's own voice through a hearing instrument would contain lower overall energy at frequencies above 2 kHz relative to speech originating in front of the talker, (b) a child's own speech would contain even lower energy above 2 kHz because of adult-child differences in overall amplitude, and (c) frequency regions important to normal speech development (e.g., high-frequency energy in the phonemes /s/ and [see text]) may not be amplified sufficiently by many hearing instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14696992     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/051)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  13 in total

1.  Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech.

Authors:  Marc Caldwell; Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 2.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

3.  Rapid word-learning in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  A L Pittman; D E Lewis; B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Does harmonicity explain children's cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise.

Authors:  Andrea Bohnert; Myriel Nyffeler; Annerose Keilmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Exploring the role of the modulation spectrum in phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Frederick Gallun; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Dawna E Lewis; Sangsook Choi; Brenda Hoover
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kathryn H Arehart; James M Kates; Naomi B H Croghan; Namita Gehani
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.