Literature DB >> 25425895

Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

B C Moore1.   

Abstract

Hearing impairment is often associated with damage to the hair cells in the cochlea. Sometimes there may be complete loss of function of inner hair cells (IHCs) over a certain region of the cochlea; this is called a "dead region". The region can be defined in terms of the range of characteristic frequencies (CFs) of the IHCs and/or neurons immediately adjacent to the dead region. This paper reviews the following topics: the effect of dead regions on the audiogram; methods for the detection and delineation of dead regions based on psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and on the measurement of thresholds for pure tones in "threshold equalizing noise" (TEN); effects of dead regions on speech perception; effects of dead regions on the perception of tones; implications of dead regions for fitting hearing aids. The main conclusions are: (1) Dead regions may be relatively common in people with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss; (2) Dead regions cannot be reliably diagnosed from the audiogram; (3) PTCs provide a useful way of detecting dead regions and defining their boundaries. However, the determination of PTCs is probably too time-consuming to be used for routine diagnosis of dead regions in clinical practice; (4) The measurement of detection thresholds for pure tones in TEN provides a simple method for clinical diagnosis of dead regions; (5) Pure tones with frequencies falling in a dead region do not evoke clear pitch sensations (pitch matching is highly variable) and the perceived pitch is sometimes, but not always, different from "normal". However, ratings of pitch clarity cannot be used as a reliable indicator of a dead region; (6) Amplification of frequencies well inside a high-frequency dead region usually does not improve speech intelligibility, and may sometimes impair it. However, there may be some benefit in amplifying frequencies up to 50 to 100% above the estimated low-frequency edge of a high-frequency dead region; (7) The optimal form of amplification for people with low-frequency dead regions remains somewhat unclear. There may be some benefit from avoiding the amplification of frequencies well inside a dead region; (8) Patients with extensive dead regions are likely to get less benefit from hearing aids than patients without dead regions; (9) For patients with diagnosed dead regions at high frequencies, consideration should be given to use of a hearing aid incorporating frequency transposition and/or compression.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 25425895      PMCID: PMC4168936          DOI: 10.1177/108471380100500102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  67 in total

1.  Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Turner; K J Cummings
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  D A Vickers; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptive bass deafness.

Authors:  D W GRAVENDEEL; R PLOMP
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-06

8.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking.

Authors:  A R Thornton; P J Abbas; P J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  41 in total

1.  Reconsidering the concept of the aided threshold for nonlinear hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Francis Kuk; Carl Ludvigsen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Rithika Saripella; Philipos C Loizou; Linda Thibodeau; Jennifer A Alford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Application of paired-comparison methods to hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-12

5.  Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise.

Authors:  Andrea Bohnert; Myriel Nyffeler; Annerose Keilmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

Review 7.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  [Effect of frequency compression in hearing aids on speech intelligibility and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  M Leifholz; S Margolf-Hackl; S Kreikemeier; J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Bimodal cochlear implants: the role of acoustic signal level in determining speech perception benefit.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Philip Loizou; Shuai Wang; Ting Zhang; Anthony Spahr; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.