Literature DB >> 23104144

Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth.

Ryan W McCreery1, Marc A Brennan, Brenda Hoover, Judy Kopun, Patricia G Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nonlinear frequency compression attempts to restore high-frequency audibility by lowering high-frequency input signals. Methods of determining the optimal parameters that maximize speech understanding have not been evaluated. The effect of maximizing the audible bandwidth on speech recognition for a group of listeners with normal hearing is described.
DESIGN: Nonword recognition was measured with 20 normal-hearing adults. Three audiograms with different high-frequency thresholds were used to create conditions with varying high-frequency audibility. Bandwidth was manipulated using three conditions for each audiogram: conventional processing, the manufacturer's default compression parameters, and compression parameters that optimized bandwidth.
RESULTS: Nonlinear frequency compression optimized to provide the widest audible bandwidth improved nonword recognition compared with both conventional processing and the default parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that using the widest audible bandwidth maximized speech identification when using nonlinear frequency compression. Future studies should apply these methods to listeners with hearing loss to demonstrate efficacy in clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23104144      PMCID: PMC3566286          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0beb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson; Adam A Hersbach; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson; Adam A Hersbach; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

5.  Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise.

Authors:  Andrea Bohnert; Myriel Nyffeler; Annerose Keilmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Myriel Nyffeler; Michael Boretzki; Teresa Caraway
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Myriel Nyffeler; Michael Boretzki; Teresa Caraway; Mary Hudson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Earl E Johnson; Erin Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  17 in total

1.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James Shehorn; Nicole Marrone; Thomas Muller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural-scaled entropy predicts the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech perception.

Authors:  Varsha H Rallapalli; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Emily Bates; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Emily Buss; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Dawna Lewis; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Dawna Lewis; Joshua Alexander; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.