Literature DB >> 23539261

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Vijay Parsa1, Susan Scollie, Danielle Glista, Andreas Seelisch.   

Abstract

Frequency lowering technologies offer an alternative amplification solution for severe to profound high frequency hearing losses. While frequency lowering technologies may improve audibility of high frequency sounds, the very nature of this processing can affect the perceived sound quality. This article reports the results from two studies that investigated the impact of a nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) algorithm on perceived sound quality. In the first study, the cutoff frequency and compression ratio parameters of the NFC algorithm were varied, and their effect on the speech quality was measured subjectively with 12 normal hearing adults, 12 normal hearing children, 13 hearing impaired adults, and 9 hearing impaired children. In the second study, 12 normal hearing and 8 hearing impaired adult listeners rated the quality of speech in quiet, speech in noise, and music after processing with a different set of NFC parameters. Results showed that the cutoff frequency parameter had more impact on sound quality ratings than the compression ratio, and that the hearing impaired adults were more tolerant to increased frequency compression than normal hearing adults. No statistically significant differences were found in the sound quality ratings of speech-in-noise and music stimuli processed through various NFC settings by hearing impaired listeners. These findings suggest that there may be an acceptable range of NFC settings for hearing impaired individuals where sound quality is not adversely affected. These results may assist an Audiologist in clinical NFC hearing aid fittings for achieving a balance between high frequency audibility and sound quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539261      PMCID: PMC4040861          DOI: 10.1177/1084713813480856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  18 in total

1.  Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson; Adam A Hersbach; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson; Adam A Hersbach; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Frequency compression hearing aid for severe-to-profound hearing impairments.

Authors:  S Sakamoto; K Goto; M Tateno; K Kaga
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 4.  Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization.

Authors:  S Arlinger; S Gatehouse; R A Bentler; D Byrne; R M Cox; D D Dirks; L Humes; A Neuman; C Ponton; K Robinson; S Silman; A Q Summerfield; C W Turner; R S Tyler; J F Willott
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; I M Taylor; G A Gray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  The time course of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  A R Horwitz; C W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Jacob Sulkers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.

Authors:  Marlene Bagatto; Sheila Moodie; Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Shane Moodie; John Pumford; K P Rachel Liu
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 10.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

2.  Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  A Review of Cisplatin-Associated Ototoxicity.

Authors:  Jessica Paken; Cyril D Govender; Mershen Pillay; Vikash Sewram
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2019-04-26

4.  Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices.

Authors:  Tiago H Falk; Vijay Parsa; João F Santos; Kathryn Arehart; Oldooz Hazrati; Rainer Huber; James M Kates; Susan Scollie
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.551

5.  Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Brenda Hoover; Joshua Alexander; Dawna Lewis; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Emily M H Lundberg; Song Hui Chon; James M Kates; Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Predicting the perceived sound quality of frequency-compressed speech.

Authors:  Rainer Huber; Vijay Parsa; Susan Scollie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Meredith Spratford; Clairissa M Mollak; Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Francisco A Rodriguez; Cory D F Portnuff; Matthew J Goupell; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Harmonic Frequency Lowering: Effects on the Perception of Music Detail and Sound Quality.

Authors:  Martin Kirchberger; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.