Literature DB >> 25951048

Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.

Benjamin James Kirby1, Carolyn J Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nonlinear frequency compression is a signal processing technique used to increase the audibility of high-frequency speech sounds for hearing aid users with sloping, high-frequency hearing loss. However, excessive compression ratios may reduce spectral contrast between sounds and negatively impact speech perception. This is of particular concern in infants and young children who may not be able to provide feedback about frequency compression settings. This study explores the use of an objective cortical auditory evoked potential that is sensitive to changes in spectral contrast, the acoustic change complex (ACC), in the verification of frequency compression parameters.
DESIGN: ACC responses were recorded from adult listeners to a spectral ripple contrast stimulus that was processed using a range of frequency compression ratios (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1). Vowel identification, consonant identification, speech recognition in noise (QuickSIN), and behavioral ripple discrimination thresholds were also measured under identical frequency compression conditions. In Experiment 1, these tasks were completed in 10 adults with normal hearing. In Experiment 2, these same tasks were repeated in 10 adults with sloping, high-frequency hearing loss.
RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis of variance was completed for each task and each group with frequency compression ratio as the within-subjects factor. Increasing the compression ratio did not affect vowel identification for the normal hearing group but did cause a significant decrease in vowel identification for the hearing-impaired listeners. Increases in compression ratio were associated with significant decrements in ACC amplitudes, consonant identification scores, ripple discrimination thresholds, and speech perception in noise scores for both groups of listeners.
CONCLUSIONS: The ACC response, like speech and nonspeech perceptual measures, is sensitive to frequency compression ratio. Additional study is needed to establish optimal stimulus and recording parameters for the clinical application of this measure in the verification of hearing aid frequency compression settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25951048      PMCID: PMC4549199          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  42 in total

1.  Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  A T Herdman; D R Stapells
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

2.  Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.

Authors:  J M Ostroff; B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wen Chang; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Bram van Dun; Shuenn-Tsong Young
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Ruth A Bentler; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Myriel Nyffeler; Michael Boretzki; Teresa Caraway
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Myriel Nyffeler; Michael Boretzki; Teresa Caraway; Mary Hudson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Y S Sininger; C Abdala; B Cone-Wesson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Carolyn J Brown; Barbara A Gienapp; Kelly M Schmidt Clay
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Joshua Alexander; Marc A Brennan; Brenda Hoover; Judy Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Vijayalakshmi Easwar; David W Purcell; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-31
View more
  7 in total

1.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Li-Kuei Chiou; Benjamin Kirby; Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; David L Horn; Anisha R Noble; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone; Spencer Smith; Diane E Cheek Smith
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

5.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

6.  Acoustic Change Complex Evoked by Horizontal Sound Location Change in Young Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Zhi-Tong Fan; Zi-Hui Zhao; Mridula Sharma; Joaquin T Valderrama; Qian-Jie Fu; Jia-Xing Liu; Xin Fu; Huan Li; Xue-Lei Zhao; Xin-Yu Guo; Luo-Yi Fu; Ning-Yu Wang; Juan Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Meredith Spratford; Clairissa M Mollak; Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.