Literature DB >> 18247913

Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Jeremy L Loebach1, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

Adaptation to the acoustic world following cochlear implantation does not typically include formal training or extensive audiological rehabilitation. Can cochlear implant (CI) users benefit from formal training, and if so, what type of training is best? This study used a pre-/posttest design to evaluate the efficacy of training and generalization of perceptual learning in normal hearing subjects listening to CI simulations (eight-channel sinewave vocoder). Five groups of subjects were trained on words (simple/complex), sentences (meaningful/anomalous), or environmental sounds, and then were tested using an open-set identification task. Subjects were trained on only one set of materials but were tested on all stimuli. All groups showed significant improvement due to training, which successfully generalized to some, but not all stimulus materials. For easier tasks, all types of training generalized equally well. For more difficult tasks, training specificity was observed. Training on speech did not generalize to the recognition of environmental sounds; however, explicit training on environmental sounds successfully generalized to speech. These data demonstrate that the perceptual learning of degraded speech is highly context dependent and the type of training and the specific stimulus materials that a subject experiences during perceptual learning has a substantial impact on generalization to new materials.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247913      PMCID: PMC3304448          DOI: 10.1121/1.2823453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Specificity of auditory implicit and explicit memory: is perceptual priming for environmental sounds exemplar specific?

Authors:  C Y Chiu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech.

Authors:  Julio Gonzalez; Juan C Oliver
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni; Adam T Tierney
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory priming for nonverbal information: Implicit and explicit memory for environmental sounds.

Authors:  C Y Chiu; D L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1995-12

6.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reception of environmental sounds through cochlear implants.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Richard J S Wise; M Alex Dresner; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  39 in total

1.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Tessa Bent; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Jeremy L Loebach; Lawrence Phillips; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; David B Pisoni; Valeriy Shafiro; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Athanassios Protopapas; Yoshiaki Tsushima; Eleni L Vlahou; Simone Gori; Stephen Grossberg; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-25

7.  Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Sejal Kuvadia; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.