Literature DB >> 31795696

Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Steven P Gianakas1, Matthew B Winn1.   

Abstract

When hearing an ambiguous speech sound, listeners show a tendency to perceive it as a phoneme that would complete a real word, rather than completing a nonsense/fake word. For example, a sound that could be heard as either /b/ or /ɡ/ is perceived as /b/ when followed by _ack but perceived as /ɡ/ when followed by "_ap." Because the target sound is acoustically identical across both environments, this effect demonstrates the influence of top-down lexical processing in speech perception. Degradations in the auditory signal were hypothesized to render speech stimuli more ambiguous, and therefore promote increased lexical bias. Stimuli included three speech continua that varied by spectral cues of varying speeds, including stop formant transitions (fast), fricative spectra (medium), and vowel formants (slow). Stimuli were presented to listeners with cochlear implants (CIs), and also to listeners with normal hearing with clear spectral quality, or with varying amounts of spectral degradation using a noise vocoder. Results indicated an increased lexical bias effect with degraded speech and for CI listeners, for whom the effect size was related to segment duration. This method can probe an individual's reliance on top-down processing even at the level of simple lexical/phonetic perception.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795696      PMCID: PMC6948217          DOI: 10.1121/1.5132938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Catherine L Rogers; Lindsay B Johnson; Soo Hee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Aniket A Saoji; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: a comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Odette Scharenborg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-03

7.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; E Katelyn Glassman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ariane E Rhone; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.