Literature DB >> 20119701

Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey.

Mahmut Balkan1, Sevgi Kalkanli, Halit Akbas, Ahmet Yalinkaya, M Nail Alp, Turgay Budak.   

Abstract

This study investigated parental decision-making to terminate or continue a pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis of a chromosomal abnormality among a sample of patients in Southeast Turkey. Between 2004 and 2007, 1068 amniocentesis tests were performed in the Medical Biology and Genetic Department Laboratory at Dicle University. Aneuploidy was found in 38 cases (3.56%). Genetic counseling was provided for the couples that received abnormal results, and they were later interviewed and asked if they had continued or interrupted the pregnancy after the diagnosis. When confronted with autosomal aneuploidy in which a severe prognosis was expected, 85% of cases decided to terminate the pregnancy. When confronted with sex chromosome aneuploidy with a low risk of an abnormal clinical phenotype 60% of cases decided to continue the pregnancy. Among the diagnoses with aneuploidy, pregnancy was continued in 21.1% of cases due to religious beliefs regardless of whether there was a low or severe risk of an abnormal clinical phenotype. These findings indicate that both severity of abnormality and religiosity play an important role in genetic counseling patients' decision-making processes and outcomes in Turkey. In addition, the findings suggest the need for legislation that reduces the differences in approaches between the physicians and institutions regarding parental decision-making to terminate or continue a pregnancy in our country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20119701     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9275-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome and prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormalities in Hawaii, 1986-1999.

Authors:  Mathias B Forrester; Ruth D Merz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Prenatal diagnosis and management of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a report on 98 cases.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Brun; Flore Gangbo; Zon Qi Wen; Katia Galant; Laurence Taine; Brigitte Maugey-Laulom; Denis Roux; Raphaelle Mangione; Jacques Horovitz; Robert Saura
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  A Drugan; A Greb; M P Johnson; E L Krivchenia; W R Uhlmann; K S Moghissi; M I Evans
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Brian L Shaffer; Aaron B Caughey; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  The role of feticide in the context of late termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of health professionals' and parents' views.

Authors:  R H Graham; K Mason; J Rankin; S C Robson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  N Press; C H Browner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in a setting where termination of pregnancy is not legally available.

Authors:  Roberto Quadrelli; Andrea Quadrelli; Búrix Mechoso; Mauricio Laufer; Ciro Jaumandreu; Alicia Vaglio
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis: "what" is still more important than "when".

Authors:  M I Evans; M A Sobiecki; E L Krivchenia; D A Duquette; A Drugan; R F Hume; M P Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-02-02

Review 9.  Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.

Authors:  Mirjam P Fransen; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Anke Oenema; Johan P Mackenbach; Eric A P Steegers; Hajo I J Wildschut
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Culture and acculturation influences on Palestinian perceptions of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Rawan Awwad; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  11 in total

1.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review.

Authors:  Kimberly A Allen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Investigating Pregnancy Outcomes After Abnormal Cell-Free DNA Test Results.

Authors:  Jessica Lu; Devereux N Saller; Luanne M Fraer; Beatrice A Chen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Attitude toward Prenatal Testing and Termination of Pregnancy among Health Professionals and Medical Students in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nagwa E A Gaboon; Khadijah H Bakur; Alaa Y Edrees; Jumana Y Al-Aama
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: implications for genetic counseling practice in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Kyoko Kumagai; Shinobu Goto; Akira Nakamura; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrina Zhong; Benedict Darren; Bethina Loiseau; Li Qun Betty He; Trillium Chang; Jessica Hill; Helen Dimaras
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Pregnancy Outcome following Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomaly: A Record Linkage Study of 26,261 Pregnancies.

Authors:  Myrthe Jacobs; Sally-Ann Cooper; Ruth McGowan; Scott M Nelson; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Claire Blakeley; Debbie M Smith; Edward D Johnstone; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.

Authors:  Robyn Lotto; Lucy K Smith; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.