Literature DB >> 8834047

Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis: "what" is still more important than "when".

M I Evans1, M A Sobiecki, E L Krivchenia, D A Duquette, A Drugan, R F Hume, M P Johnson.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine if parental decisions to continue or terminate following the diagnosis of a cytogenetic abnormality have changed over the past 8 years at the same center. Parental decisions in 310 prenatal chromosomal abnormalities were stratified by procedure (chorionic villus sampling [CVS] vs. amniocentesis) and the severity of the anomaly (severe vs mild-moderate). Patients with severe anomalies were much more likely to terminate regardless of gestational age. There was a trend (P = .107) toward a lower rate of termination for mild-moderate degrees in the second trimester. There was no change in patient's decisions over time. Patients' decisions about termination are focused on the severity of the disorder and only marginally influenced by when in gestation the decision is made.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8834047     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960202)61:4<353::AID-AJMG9>3.0.CO;2-V

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders; Penelope P Howards; Godfrey P Oakley; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-25

3.  Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey.

Authors:  Mahmut Balkan; Sevgi Kalkanli; Halit Akbas; Ahmet Yalinkaya; M Nail Alp; Turgay Budak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise Bryant; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Ethical issues in fetal management: a cardiac perspective.

Authors:  Atul Malhotra; Samuel Menahem; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-24

7.  A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Judith L S Budd; Elizabeth S Draper; Robyn R Lotto; Laura E Berry; Lucy K Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.747

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.