Literature DB >> 17597492

Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.

Mirjam P Fransen1, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Anke Oenema, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Hajo I J Wildschut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a theoretical framework for analysing ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome.
METHODS: We applied Weinstein's Precaution Adoption Process (PAP) Model to the decision of whether or not to participate in prenatal screening for Down syndrome. The prenatal screening stage model was specified by reviewing the empirical literature and by data from seven focus group interviews with Dutch, Turkish and Surinamese pregnant women in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: We identified 11 empirical studies on ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome. The focus group interviews showed that almost all stages and determinants in the stage model were relevant in women's decision-making process. However, there were ethnic variations in the relevance of determinants, such as beliefs about personal consequences of having a child with Down syndrome or cultural and religious norms. DISCUSSION: The prenatal screening stage model can be applied as a framework to describe the decision-making process of pregnant women from different ethnic backgrounds. It provides scope for developing culturally sensitive, tailored methods to guide pregnant women towards informed decision-making on participation or non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17597492     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  12 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey.

Authors:  Mahmut Balkan; Sevgi Kalkanli; Halit Akbas; Ahmet Yalinkaya; M Nail Alp; Turgay Budak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Natasha O'Reilly; Holly Etchegary; Heather Howley; Ian D Graham; Mark Walker; Doug Coyle; Yelena Chorny; Mario Cappelli; Isabelle Boland; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Engagement and communication among participants in the ClinSeq Genomic Sequencing Study.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kendall L Umstead; Katie L Lewis; Laura K Koehly; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Ynke E Vellinga; Sandra A Kluijfhout; Louise D Bryant; Pat A Ward; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Ann Tabor; Janet Hirst
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Correlates of knowledge of genetic diseases and congenital anomalies among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Lagos, South-West Nigeria.

Authors:  Chibuzor Franklin Ogamba; Alero Ann Roberts; Ochuwa Adiketu Babah; Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi; Oluwaseun Joseph Ologunja; Oluyinka Kehinde Amodeni
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-03-28

7.  Women's attitude towards prenatal screening for red blood cell antibodies, other than RhD.

Authors:  J M Koelewijn; T G M Vrijkotte; M de Haas; C E van der Schoot; G J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Prenatal screening for congenital anomalies: exploring midwives' perceptions of counseling clients with religious backgrounds.

Authors:  Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Judith Manniën; Lisanne A Gitsels; Hans S Reinders; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Mohammed M Ghaly; Trudy Klomp; Eileen K Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S Reinders; Evelien Spelten; Eileen K Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Factors associated with utilization of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chuanlin Li; Leiyu Shi; Jiayan Huang; Xu Qian; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.