Literature DB >> 28035593

A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Amy R Reed1, Kathryn L Berrier2.   

Abstract

Previous research has identified twenty-six factors that may affect pregnancy management decisions following prenatal diagnosis of DS; however, there is no consensus about the relative importance or effects of these factors. In order to better understand patient decision-making, we conducted expansive cognitive interviews with nine former patients who received a prenatal diagnosis of DS. Our results suggest that patients attached unique meanings to factors influencing decision-making regardless of the pregnancy outcome. Nineteen of the twenty-six factors previously studied and four novel factors (rationale for testing, information quality, pregnancy experience, and perception of parenting abilities and goals) were found to be important to decision-making. We argue that qualitative studies can help characterize the complexity of decision-making following prenatal diagnosis of DS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adoption; Decision-making; Down syndrome; Prenatal testing; Termination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035593     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0061-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

Review 1.  Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.

Authors:  Debbie Collins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  A Drugan; A Greb; M P Johnson; E L Krivchenia; W R Uhlmann; K S Moghissi; M I Evans
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Brian L Shaffer; Aaron B Caughey; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in a setting where termination of pregnancy is not legally available.

Authors:  Roberto Quadrelli; Andrea Quadrelli; Búrix Mechoso; Mauricio Laufer; Ciro Jaumandreu; Alicia Vaglio
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.

Authors:  P G Pryde; A Drugan; M P Johnson; N B Isada; M I Evans
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey.

Authors:  Mahmut Balkan; Sevgi Kalkanli; Halit Akbas; Ahmet Yalinkaya; M Nail Alp; Turgay Budak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Patricia L Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K Brasington; Pamela Flodman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Association of ultrasound findings with decision to continue Down syndrome pregnancies.

Authors:  Sandy Perry; Angela L Woodall; Eva K Pressman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007
View more
  4 in total

1.  Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiang Huang; Shu-Fang Shih; Chen-Li Lin; Chieh-Hsing Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Claire Blakeley; Debbie M Smith; Edward D Johnstone; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Satomi Inoue; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Osamu Samura; Takahiro Yamada; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Haruka Hamanoue; Yoshimasa Kamei; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Shinya Tairaku; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Hisao Osada; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Aiko Sasaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Angela Barrett; Mahesh Choolani; Celine Lewis; Jane Fisher; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.050

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.