Literature DB >> 16724363

Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Brian L Shaffer1, Aaron B Caughey, Mary E Norton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of pregnancy termination for various fetal aneuploidies, and to evaluate predictors of this choice.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified all patients with any of seven common fetal aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13; 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY) at a referral prenatal diagnosis unit from 1983 to 2003. We abstracted type of aneuploidy, time and type of diagnostic procedure, maternal age, and ethnicity as predictors of the decision to terminate. Statistical comparisons were made using the chi-square test. Potential confounding variables were controlled for using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, there were 833 patients who had fetuses with aneuploidy. In our study population, the overall rate of termination was 81%: 86% in cases of autosomal trisomy and 60% in cases of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) (p < 0.001). Rates were lowest in cases with the least severe prognosis, 47,XYY (57%) and 47,XXX (40%) compared with 45,X (65%) and 47,XXY (70%) (p = 0.05). Patients with SCA detected by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) had a higher termination rate than those who had undergone amniocentesis (77% vs 55%, p = 0.015). Increased maternal age was associated with higher termination rates in autosomal trisomy (88% vs 76% p < 0.001) and a trend toward decreased rates in those with SCA (55% vs 71%, p = 0.06). Hispanic women were less likely to terminate pregnancy (69%, p = 0.01) than those from other racial/ethnic groups.
CONCLUSION: Type and severity of aneuploidy, type of diagnostic procedure, maternal age, and ethnicity contribute to patients' decision-making in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724363     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  26 in total

1.  "The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby": Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China.

Authors:  Grace Li; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Megan Allyse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders; Penelope P Howards; Godfrey P Oakley; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-25

4.  Is maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects?

Authors:  Hao T Duong; Adrienne T Hoyt; Suzan L Carmichael; Suzanne M Gilboa; Mark A Canfield; Amy Case; Melanie L McNeese; Dorothy Kim Waller
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-02-28

5.  Current survey of early childhood intervention services in infants and young children with sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Authors:  Talia Thompson; Susan Howell; Shanlee Davis; Rebecca Wilson; Jennifer Janusz; Richard Boada; Laura Pyle; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  Grief after second-trimester termination for fetal anomaly: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marguerite Maguire; Alexis Light; Miriam Kuppermann; Vanessa K Dalton; Jody E Steinauer; Jennifer L Kerns
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Ethical issues in fetal management: a cardiac perspective.

Authors:  Atul Malhotra; Samuel Menahem; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 8.  A review of trisomy X (47,XXX).

Authors:  Nicole R Tartaglia; Susan Howell; Ashley Sutherland; Rebecca Wilson; Lennie Wilson
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: implications for genetic counseling practice in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Kyoko Kumagai; Shinobu Goto; Akira Nakamura; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Documenting moral agency: a qualitative analysis of abortion decision making for fetal indications.

Authors:  Lori M Gawron; Katie Watson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.