Literature DB >> 29368276

Investigating Pregnancy Outcomes After Abnormal Cell-Free DNA Test Results.

Jessica Lu1, Devereux N Saller1, Luanne M Fraer1, Beatrice A Chen2,3.   

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing has increased sensitivity and specificity compared to other prenatal screening methods, but invasive diagnostic testing (IDT) is recommended for confirmation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 39 women with abnormal cfDNA results between March 2012 and September 2015 at an urban academic hospital to evaluate patient choice and pregnancy outcomes. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Median maternal age was 36.0 years [interquartile range (IQR) 31, 39]; 64.1% of women (25/39) were advanced maternal age and 69.2% (27/39) had abnormal ultrasounds. Median gestational age at time of cfDNA testing was 18 3/7 weeks [IQR 12 2/7, 20 5/7]. cfDNA results included trisomy 21 (89.7%, 35/39), trisomy 18 (7.7%, 3/39), and both trisomy 21/monosomy X (2.6%, 1/39). Of 39 women, 22 (56.4%) continued and 10 (25.6%) terminated the pregnancy; six (15.4%) had fetal demises, and one was lost to follow-up. Of women continuing their pregnancies, 54.6% (12/22) declined further genetic counseling, and 77.3% (17/22) declined IDT. Only 14 women pursued IDT; not pursuing IDT was associated with continuing the pregnancy (Fisher's exact test, p = .001). All women terminating their pregnancy (90.0%, 9/10) pursued IDT or had major anomalies on ultrasound, suggesting that women considering termination undergo more confirmatory tests or already have high suspicion for an abnormal pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Cell-free DNA; Chromosome abnormality; Genetic counseling; Invasive diagnostic testing; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Pregnancy termination; Prenatal diagnosis; Prenatal screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368276     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0219-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  12 in total

1.  Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy with an abnormal finding after an invasive prenatal test.

Authors:  Joël Zlotogora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18.

Authors:  Ghalia Ashoor; Argyro Syngelaki; Marion Wagner; Cahit Birdir; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Lawrence D Platt; James D Goldberg; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey.

Authors:  Mahmut Balkan; Sevgi Kalkanli; Halit Akbas; Ahmet Yalinkaya; M Nail Alp; Turgay Budak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Meeting patients' education and decision-making needs for first trimester prenatal aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Benjamin Nutter; Patricia K Agatisa
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Shilpa Chetty; Matthew J Garabedian; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Recent advances in non-invasive prenatal DNA diagnosis through analysis of maternal blood.

Authors:  Akihiko Sekizawa; Yuditiya Purwosunu; Ryu Matsuoka; Keiko Koide; Shiho Okazaki; Antonio Farina; Hiroshi Saito; Takashi Okai
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Practice Bulletin No. 162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Women's views and the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on procedures in a managed care setting.

Authors:  George E Tiller; Hilary B Kershberg; John Goff; Christin Coffeen; Wayne Liao; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.