Literature DB >> 36002751

How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.

Victoria G Woof1, Anthony Howell2,3, Lorna McWilliams2, D Gareth Evans2,3, David P French2.   

Abstract

This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women's personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36002751     DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   9.075


  28 in total

1.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Breast cancer prevention: patient decision making and risk communication in the high risk setting.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Eve Wittenberg; Judy E Garber; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

4.  How (or Do) People "Think" About Cancer Risk, and Why That Matters.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Annette R Kaufman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  J Hilgart; C Phelps; P Bennett; K Hood; K Brain; A Murray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Lustbader; B Rimer; M Daly; S Miller; C Sands; A Balshem
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

8.  Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  E A Lobb; P N Butow; B Meiser; A Barratt; C Gaff; M A Young; J Kirk; M Gattas; M Gleeson; K Tucker
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  How do women at increased breast cancer risk perceive and decide between risks of cancer and risk-reducing treatments? A synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Hannah G Fielden; Stephen L Brown; Pooja Saini; Helen Beesley; Peter Salmon
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.