Literature DB >> 15959643

Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Ann-Marie Codori1, Tracy Waldeck, Gloria M Petersen, Diana Miglioretti, Jill D Trimbath, Miriam A Tillery.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling may turn risk information into cancer prevention behavior by modifying health beliefs and cancer-related distress. We assessed the effect of genetic counseling on these factors in 101 adult first-degree-relatives of colorectal cancer patients from families with known or suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Before counseling and once afterward, subjects completed self-report measures of perceived lifetime risk and cancer-distress. Most persons overestimated their cancer risk, and higher perceived risk was associated with believing that colorectal cancer cannot be prevented. Individual perceived risk changed after counseling, although mean perceived risk was unchanged. After adjusting for baseline risk, older persons and those with higher estimated objective cancer risk had larger postcounseling decreases. Distress after counseling was positively correlated with baseline distress and anxiety symptoms, and inversely correlated with tolerance for ambiguity. The findings suggest counseling interventions that should increase the likelihood of screening and offer hypotheses for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959643     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-4062-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  66 in total

1.  Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  K Nordin; A Lidén; M Hansson; R Rosenquist; G Berglund
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary forms of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G M Petersen; J D Brensinger; K A Johnson; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Carolina M Reyes; Brian A Allen; Jonathan P Terdiman; Leslie S Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale.

Authors:  M D Miller; D G Ferris
Journal:  Fam Pract Res J       Date:  1993-03

5.  Life event weighting systems: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  D A Chiriboga
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Trends in screening for colorectal cancer--United States, 1997 and 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 7.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Early detection of colorectal cancer: a profile of current practice.

Authors:  J E Byles; R W Sanson-Fisher; S Redman; A L Reid; M Agrez
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

9.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Affective disorders and depression as measured by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the Beck Depression Inventory in an unselected adult population.

Authors:  J M Oliver; M E Simmons
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-07
View more
  16 in total

1.  Parents' perspectives on participating in genetic research in autism.

Authors:  Magan Trottier; Wendy Roberts; Irene Drmic; Stephen W Scherer; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

2.  Balancing life with an increased risk of cancer: lived experiences in healthy individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mef Nilbert; Inge Bernstein; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  J Hilgart; C Phelps; P Bennett; K Hood; K Brain; A Murray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Changes in screening behaviors and attitudes toward screening from pre-test genetic counseling to post-disclosure in Lynch syndrome families.

Authors:  A M Burton-Chase; S R Hovick; S K Peterson; S K Marani; S W Vernon; C I Amos; M L Frazier; P M Lynch; E R Gritz
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Patient preferences regarding recontact by cancer genetics clinicians.

Authors:  Constance A Griffin; Jennifer E Axilbund; Ann Marie Codori; Ginny Deise; Betty May; Cheryl Pendergrass; Miriam Tillery; Jill D Trimbath; Francis M Giardiello
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Counsellee's experience of cancer genetic counselling with pedigrees that automatically incorporate genealogical and cancer database information.

Authors:  Vigdis Stefansdottir; Oskar Th Johannsson; Heather Skirton; Jon J Jonsson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-02

9.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.