Literature DB >> 25783675

Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Ronald E Myers1, Karen Ruth2, Sharon L Manne3, James Cocroft4, Randa Sifri4, Barry Ziring4, Desiree Burgh4, Eric Ross2, David S Weinberg2.   

Abstract

Little is known about the impact of genetic and environmental risk assessment (GERA) feedback on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In a recently completed randomized trial, primary care patients received GERA feedback based on a blood test for genetic polymorphisms and serum folate level (GERA Group) versus usual care (Control Group). Subsequently, participants were offered CRC screening. Among participants who received GERA feedback, being at elevated risk was negatively associated with prospective CRC screening adherence. Secondary analyses of data from this study were performed to identify independent predictors of adherence among participants who received GERA feedback. We obtained baseline survey, follow-up survey, and endpoint medical records data on sociodemographic background, knowledge, psychosocial characteristics, risk status, and adherence for 285 GERA Group participants. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of CRC screening adherence. Following a 6-month outcomes observation period, we also conducted two focus groups with GERA Group participants to assess their perceptions of GERA risk feedback and screening. Content analyses of focus group data were evaluated to gain insights into participant response to risk feedback. Overall, half of GERA Group participants adhered to screening within 6 months after randomization. Multivariable analyses showed a statistically significant interaction between race and GERA feedback status relative to screening adherence (p = 0.043). Among participants who received average risk feedback, adherence was comparable among whites (49.7 %) and nonwhites (54.1 %); however, among those at elevated risk, adherence was substantially higher among whites (66.7 %) compared to nonwhites (33.3 %). Focus group findings suggest that whites were more likely than nonwhites to view elevated risk feedback as a prompt to screen. In response to receiving elevated risk feedback, nonwhites were more likely than whites to report feeling anxiety about the likelihood of being diagnosed with CRC. Further research is needed to explore race-related CRC screening differences in response to GERA feedback.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Cancer; Colorectal; Environment; Genetic; Risk assessment; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783675     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  46 in total

1.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Mediated decision support in prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial of decision counseling.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Constantine Daskalakis; Elisabeth J S Kunkel; James R Cocroft; Jeffrey M Riggio; Mark Capkin; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-07-08

3.  Population Colorectal Cancer Screening Estimates: Comparing Self-Report to Electronic Health Record Data in California.

Authors:  Latha P Palaniappan; Annette E Maxwell; Catherine M Crespi; Eric C Wong; Jessica Shin; Elsie J Wang
Journal:  Int J Canc Prev       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Beyond attentional strategies: cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation.

Authors:  D Cioffi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population: a randomized trial.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Ronald E Myers; Eileen Keenan; Karen Ruth; Randa Sifri; Barry Ziring; Eric Ross; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Depression, self-focused attention, and expectancies for positive and negative future life events for self and others.

Authors:  T Pyszczynski; K Holt; J Greenberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-05

9.  Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Kathleen A Griffith; Deborah B McGuire; Renee Royak-Schaler; Keith O Plowden; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Folate Intake, MTHFR Polymorphisms, and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Deborah A Kennedy; Seth J Stern; Ilan Matok; Myla E Moretti; Moumita Sarkar; Thomasin Adams-Webber; Gideon Koren
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-18
View more
  4 in total

1.  Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

2.  Interest in genetic testing and risk-reducing behavioral changes: results from a community health assessment in New York City.

Authors:  Sarah M Lima; Meaghan Nazareth; Karen M Schmitt; Andria Reyes; Elaine Fleck; Gary K Schwartz; Mary Beth Terry; Grace C Hillyer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-10-13

3.  Vitamin D Regulation of the Uridine Phosphorylase 1 Gene and Uridine-Induced DNA Damage in Colon in African Americans and European Americans.

Authors:  Nobel Bhasin; Dereck Alleyne; Olivia A Gray; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk: Current Status and Future Potential.

Authors:  Steffie K Naber; Suman Kundu; Karen M Kuntz; W David Dotson; Marc S Williams; Ann G Zauber; Ned Calonge; Doris T Zallen; Theodore G Ganiats; Elizabeth M Webber; Katrina A B Goddard; Nora B Henrikson; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; A Cecile J W Janssens; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-10-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.