Literature DB >> 2011464

The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

J Miller1.   

Abstract

When subjects must respond to a relevant center letter and ignore irrelevant flanking letters, the identities of the flankers produce a response compatibility effect, indicating that they are processed semantically at least to some extent. Because this effect decreases as the separation between target and flankers increases, the effect appears to result from imperfect early selection (attenuation). In the present experiments, several features of the focused attention paradigm were examined, in order to determine whether they might produce the flanker compatibility effect by interfering with the operation of an early selective mechanism. Specifically, the effect might be produced because the paradigm requires subjects to (1) attend exclusively to stimuli within a very small visual angle, (2) maintain a long-term attentional focus on a constant display location, (3) focus attention on an empty display location, (4) exclude onset-transient flankers from semantic processing, or (5) ignore some of the few stimuli in an impoverished visual field. The results indicate that none of these task features is required for semantic processing of unattended stimuli to occur. In fact, visual angle is the only one of the task features that clearly has a strong influence on the size of the flanker compatibility effect. The invariance of the flanker compatibility effect across these conditions suggests that the mechanism for early selection rarely, if ever, completely excludes unattended stimuli from semantic analysis. In addition, it shows that selective mechanisms are relatively insensitive to several factors that might be expected to influence them, thereby supporting the view that spatial separation has a special status for visual selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2011464     DOI: 10.3758/bf03214311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  38 in total

1.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

2.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.

Authors:  T D Murphy; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

3.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

4.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.

Authors:  A Treisman; D Kahneman; J Burkell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-06

5.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention.

Authors:  W A Johnston; V J Dark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  61 in total

1.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.

Authors:  Uwe Mattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

5.  Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

6.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

8.  The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S A Wylie; W P M van den Wildenberg; K R Ridderinkhof; T R Bashore; V D Powell; C A Manning; G F Wooten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  At the heart of the ventral attention system: the right anterior insula.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Vinod Menon; Adam Walczak; Jayne Ahlstrom; Stewart Denslow; Amy Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Contributions of the human pulvinar to linking vision and action.

Authors:  Shai Danziger; Robert Ward; Vanessa Owen; Robert Rafal
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.