Literature DB >> 6223977

Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

D LaBerge.   

Abstract

The spatial extent of attention to visually presented letters and words was investigated using a probe technique. The primary task required subjects to categorize (a) five-letter words, or to categorize the middle letter of (b) five-letter words or (c) five-letter nonwords. The probe task required the subjects to respond when the digit 7 appeared in one of the five letter positions. Probe trials were inserted at the onset of letter and word processing in Experiment 1 and 500 msec after letter and word processing in Experiment 2. In both experiments, probe trials produced a V-shaped function of reaction times across probe positions for the letter-categorization task for word and nonword stimulus conditions. In contrast, a relatively flat reaction time function was found for the word-categorization tasks. An analysis of the data based on a quantitative model of attentional spotlight distributions suggests that the spotlight width in the letter tasks is one letter space, and the spotlight width in the word task is typically five spaces.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6223977     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.3.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  108 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

5.  Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.

Authors:  M Kathryn Bleckley; Francis T Durso; Jerry M Crutchfield; Randall W Engle; Maya M Khanna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J Kieley; C R McKenzie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

8.  Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

9.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

10.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

Authors:  C B Warner; J F Juola; H Koshino
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.